In this article, the topic of Scots Wikipedia will be addressed from a broad and detailed perspective. Through an exhaustive analysis, different aspects related to Scots Wikipedia will be explored, including its origin, evolution and relevance today. Different points of view, theories and studies on Scots Wikipedia will be examined, in order to provide a comprehensive and enriching vision on this topic. In addition, concrete examples and practical cases will be analyzed that illustrate the importance and influence of Scots Wikipedia in different contexts. Finally, reflections and conclusions will be proposed that invite readers to deepen their understanding and appreciation of Scots Wikipedia.
Logo of the Scots Wikipedia | |
Type of site | Internet encyclopaedia |
|---|---|
| Available in | Scots |
| Owner | Wikimedia Foundation |
| URL | sco.wikipedia.org |
| Commercial | No |
| Registration | Optional |
| Users | 123,298 users, 3 administrators as of 14 December 2025 |
| Launched | 23 June 2005 |
Content license | Creative Commons Attribution/ Share-Alike 4.0 (most text also dual-licensed under GFDL) Media licensing varies |
The Scots Wikipedia (Scots: Scots Wikipædia)[a] is the Scots-language edition of the free online encyclopedia, Wikipedia. It was established on 23 June 2005, and it reached 1,000 articles in February 2006, and 5,000 articles in November 2010. It has now 34,282 articles and is the 114th-largest Wikipedia.
The Scots Wikipedia is one of nine Wikipedias written in an Anglic language or English-based pidgin or creole, the others being the English Wikipedia, the Simple English Wikipedia, the Old English Wikipedia, the Tok Pisin (Paupan Pidgin) Wikipedia, the Jamaican Patois Wikipedia, the Sranan Tongo Wikipedia, the Nigerian Pidgin Wikipedia, and the Ghanaian Pidgin Wikipedia.
In August 2020, the wiki received scrutiny from the media for the poor quality of its Scots writing and the discovery that at least 20,000 articles had been written by an editor who did not speak the language. This attention led to a review of the wiki's content by Scots speakers as well as editors from the wider Wikipedia community.[1] Most of the editor's articles were deleted, reducing the number of articles from about 55,000 in 2018[2] to about 40,000 in 2021.
By February 2008, the site contained 2,200 articles[3] and had outpaced Māori Wikipedia and Kashmiri Wikipedia. Reported reception, however, was mixed: Scotland on Sunday's literary editor described it as "convoluted at best, and an absolute parody at worst",[4] while Ted Brocklebank, culture spokesman for the Scottish Tories, described it as a "cheap attempt at creating a language".[4] However, Chris Robinson, director of the Dictionary of the Scots Language, wrote: "The fact it is doing well gives a lie to all those people who decry Scots and try to do it down."[4] In 2014, Jane C. Hu of Slate described the site as reading "like a transcription of a person with a Scottish accent" and said one Wikipedia editor had proposed that the project be closed, in the mistaken belief that it was a practical joke.[5]
In August 2020, the site attracted attention after a Reddit post noted that the project contained an unusually high number of articles written in poor-quality Scots. They were written by a single prolific contributor, who was an American teenager. These articles consisted of mostly English instead of Scots vocabulary and grammar. It is claimed that the editor apparently used an online English–Scots dictionary to translate parts of English Wikipedia articles word-by-word, without regard for syntax.
Over 23,000 articles, approximately a third of the entire Scots Wikipedia at that time, were created by the editor. These articles have been described as "English written in a Scottish accent," with gibberish and nonsensical words and spellings not present in any Scots dialect. Following public backlash, the editor reportedly wrote an apology.[6][7][8][9][10][11]
In response to the controversy, the Scots Wikipedia started a review of its articles for language inaccuracies, and deleted many of the affected articles.[1][2]
Robert McColl Millar, professor in linguistics and Scottish language at the University of Aberdeen, has said that the affected articles displayed "a very limited knowledge both of Modern Scots and its earlier manifestations".[7] Michael Dempster, director of the Scots Language Centre, contacted the Wikimedia Foundation over the possibility of building upon the Scots Wikipedia's existing infrastructure, describing the renewed interest in the site as having "potential to be a great online focus" for the Scots language.[9]
Nineteen-year-old says he is 'devastated' after being accused of cultural vandalism