In today's world, Slice genus has become a topic of constant interest and debate. There are many aspects surrounding Slice genus that make it relevant to different areas of society. From its impact on the economy, politics and culture, to its influence on people's daily lives, Slice genus appears to be a topic of great importance. In this article, we will explore the many facets of Slice genus and analyze its relevance in different contexts. From its origin to its current impact, we will seek to better understand Slice genus and its place in today's world.
In mathematics, the slice genus of a smooth knot K in S3 (sometimes called its Murasugi genus or 4-ball genus) is the least integer g such that K is the boundary of a connected, compact, orientable 2-manifold S of genus g properly embedded in the 4-ball D4 bounded by S3.
More precisely, if S is required to be smoothly embedded, then this integer g is the smooth slice genus of K and is often denoted gs(K) or g4(K), whereas if S is required only to be topologically locally flatly embedded then g is the topologically locally flat slice genus of K. (There is no point considering g if S is required only to be a topological embedding, since the cone on K is a 2-disk with genus 0.) There can be an arbitrarily great difference between the smooth and the topologically locally flat slice genus of a knot; a theorem of Michael Freedman says that if the Alexander polynomial of K is 1, then the topologically locally flat slice genus of K is 0, but it can be proved in many ways (originally with gauge theory) that for every g there exist knots K such that the Alexander polynomial of K is 1 while the genus and the smooth slice genus of K both equal g.
The (smooth) slice genus of a knot K is bounded below by a quantity involving the Thurston–Bennequin invariant of K:
The (smooth) slice genus is zero if and only if the knot is concordant to the unknot.