Specificity (symbiosis)

In today's world, Specificity (symbiosis) has become a topic of constant interest and debate. With the advancement of technology and social networks, Specificity (symbiosis) has taken on a relevant role in our society. Whether Specificity (symbiosis) is a person, a historical event, a natural phenomenon, or a scientific discovery, his impact has been felt in all areas of life. In this article, we will further explore the importance of Specificity (symbiosis) and analyze how it has shaped our world in different ways. In addition, we will examine the different perspectives and opinions that exist around Specificity (symbiosis), and we will analyze its influence on our present and future. Read on to discover more about this exciting topic!

Specificity in symbiosis refers to the taxonomic range with which an organism associates in a symbiosis. In a symbiosis between a larger organism such as a plant or an animal (called host) and a microorganism (called symbiont) specificity can be looked at both from the perspective of the host i.e. how many different species of symbionts does the host associate with (symbiont specificity), as well as from the perspective of the symbiont i.e. how many different host species can a symbiont associate with (host specificity).

There are two major approaches to determine specificity, the field based (ecological) approach and the physiological (experimental) approach. In the field based approach specificity is assessed by determining the natural range of hosts or symbionts an organism associates with. In the physiological approach combinations of potential symbiotic partners are brought together artificially in the laboratory and the successful establishment of symbiosis is assessed. For example, while in the laboratory the midgut crypts of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris can be colonized by a large diversity of bacterial species in nature it only occurs with one specific Burkholderia species.

References

  1. ^ a b Douglas, Angela E. (2010-04-08). The Symbiotic Habit. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-3543-0.
  2. ^ Moran, Nancy A. (2006-10-24). "Symbiosis". Current Biology. 16 (20): R866–R871. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.019. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 17055966.
  3. ^ Wang, Dong; Yang, Shengming; Tang, Fang; Zhu, Hongyan (2012). "Symbiosis specificity in the legume – rhizobial mutualism". Cellular Microbiology. 14 (3): 334–342. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01736.x. ISSN 1462-5822. PMID 22168434. S2CID 34904633.
  4. ^ Mandel, Mark J. (2010-11-01). "Models and approaches to dissect host–symbiont specificity". Trends in Microbiology. 18 (11): 504–511. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2010.07.005. ISSN 0966-842X. PMID 20729086.
  5. ^ Itoh, Hideomi; Jang, Seonghan; Takeshita, Kazutaka; Ohbayashi, Tsubasa; Ohnishi, Naomi; Meng, Xian-Ying; Mitani, Yasuo; Kikuchi, Yoshitomo (2019-11-05). "Host–symbiont specificity determined by microbe–microbe competition in an insect gut". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (45): 22673–22682. doi:10.1073/pnas.1912397116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6842582. PMID 31636183.