In today's world, Talk:Art Deco has become a topic of great relevance and interest. Over time, Talk:Art Deco has gained greater importance in various fields, from technology to politics, including culture and the arts. Both experts and the general public have shown growing interest in learning more about Talk:Art Deco, its implications, challenges and opportunities. In this article, we will explore Talk:Art Deco in depth, analyzing its different facets and its impact on today's society. From its origin to its future projection, we will delve into a detailed analysis that will allow us to fully understand the importance of Talk:Art Deco today.
| Art Deco was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Former good article nominee | |||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article is all over the place. It would ideally be organized similar to the Art Nouveau article, with a unified History section, a Characteristics section, a section summarizing how Art Deco was expressed in different mediums (jewelry, furniture, graphic arts, etc), and perhaps a Local variations section. As it is right now, it's very disorganized, with about a dozen sections for various mediums that are largely arbitrary distinctions. Not to mention the Style of luxury and modernity section, which is an essay sneaked into an encyclopedia article, and a gallery at the end with images that should be placed near relevant text.
This is not to say it's all bad - the Origins section is largely ok, the Etymology section might need trimmed down but is needed, and the actual content throughout the article is generally fine. It's just so disorganized that I don't know where to start. I would consider separating info about architecture from info about the arts (perhaps even splitting the article), though I acknowledge that they are interconnected, since much of the content focuses exclusively on Art Deco architecture. But generally consolidation is needed. Does anyone have any ideas about how to fix this? BappleBusiness 22:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Dark Deco has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Dark Deco until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Is there any source that claims Louis XVI style influenced Art Deco? I found that Paul Follot did design furniture in the Louis style and afterward his style evolved towards Art Deco. That is the evolution of the designer, it has no influence on the Art Deco as a style. Noirar (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Laura.antholzner (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Laura.antholzner (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Just way, way too much. You are not supposed to solve the universe in the article man…. If you gave this to a highschool English teacher, do you really think you wouldn't get an F and asked to see the teacher after class? This is ridiculous. 2600:4040:AEB5:AC00:D1BF:2A6:81B5:C5FF (talk) 10:43, 23 September 2025 (UTC)