In today's article we are going to delve into Talk:Closed adoption, a topic that has sparked the interest of many people in recent years. Since its emergence, Talk:Closed adoption has captured the attention of experts and fans alike, generating debates and controversies in different areas. As Talk:Closed adoption continues to evolve, it is crucial to understand its impact on our society and how we can adapt to the changes it brings. In this article, we will explore the most relevant aspects of Talk:Closed adoption, from its origin to its influence in today's world, analyzing the different perspectives that exist around this topic.
Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement C‑class (inactive) | |||||||
|
There are two concepts mixed together on this page:
Compare with:
Intuitively, one would expect open adoptions to have open records, and closed adoptions to have sealed records, but it's possible to have a closed adoption with open records, or an open adoption with sealed records.Schizombie 07:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
References and citations are needed on this page DPetersontalk 01:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I was wanting to know if anyone here was actually part of a clsoed adoption. I myself was adopted when I was ten, and I was wondering what their perspective on this whole matter was.Solon Olrek 15:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
The term "natural" is vague. An adoptive parent is a natural parent, and likewise, a birth parent is also a natural parent. Thus, it is best to use "birth" or "biological" to differentiate the two.--Elizabeth Brey 18:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
The term "Birth" is also problematic as can be viewed as insulting/demeaning. See the section on the language of adoption in adoption. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 18:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
See related talk section in Talk:Open adoption. --Ed Brey (talk) 12:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
A Google search for "secret adoption" turns up numerous hits about a form of adoption where the child or friends of the adoptive family don't know about this adoption, which is different than a typical "closed adoption". This indicates that the common use of the terms "secret adoption" and "closed adoption" are not synonyms, and so "secret adoption" should not be in the first sentence. --Ed Brey (talk) 11:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Closed_adoption&diff=308996789&oldid=308254422 might deserve some more consensus. Шизомби (talk) 01:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
The wrong title is shown on Wikipedia in 2012: "Directory of Hospitals, Orphanages, Adoption Agencies and Maternity Homes." The correct title is: "Adoption Agencies, Orphanages and Maternity Homes: An Historical Directory," by Reg Niles. Online at: http://www.triadoption.com/Reg%20Niles%20AAOMH.htm
Reg Niles (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reg Niles
Done
Much of this article seems to be copied word for word from Adoption by Paul Muljadi -- for one example, see the Background and Procedure section on page 30.
I apologize -- I am not familiar with standard practice in a case like this, but I wanted to bring it to someone's attention.
68.186.184.29 (talk) 02:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Closed adoption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Closed adoption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Closed adoption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)