Talk:Employment testing

In the following article we will delve into the fascinating world of Talk:Employment testing, exploring its various facets and discovering the importance it has in our current society. Talk:Employment testing has been an object of interest and study for a long time, and its influence extends to different areas of daily life. Along these lines, we will analyze in depth its impact on culture, technology, politics and many other relevant aspects. In addition, we will examine its evolution over time and how it has marked trends and significant changes in different fields. Get ready to immerse yourself in an exciting journey through Talk:Employment testing and discover everything this theme has to offer us.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The Meyers-Brigg Type Indicator (MBTI) is missing from the personality tests. This is probably the most common personality test out here more so than the "Big 5" and much more useful.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Abbiemackenzie. Peer reviewers: Majames5.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Common job test - spam?

I'm not sure if the Common Job Test section is spam or not. It's written in a very advertisement kind of way and doesn't have any sources - so it needs to be rewritten at least - but I'm not sure if it should just be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.59.221.74 (talk) 00:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)