In this article, we are going to explore in detail the topic of Talk:Grotesque (architecture), a topic that has sparked great interest and debate in recent times. From its origins to its impact on today's society, Talk:Grotesque (architecture) has been the subject of study and analysis by experts from various disciplines. Throughout this article, we will examine the different perspectives on Talk:Grotesque (architecture), as well as its relevance in the historical and cultural context. Additionally, we will delve into specific aspects that will help better understand the importance of Talk:Grotesque (architecture) today, as well as its possible implications for the future. Get ready to immerse yourself in a fascinating journey through the universe of Talk:Grotesque (architecture)!
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if this section of the article:
is really adding anything useful to the article? i am inclined to remove but, thought that I'd ask you first. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 04:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. EdJohnston (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Chimera (architecture) → Grotesque (architecture) – Per Grotesque#In_architecture and a skim of online sources, the terms chimera and grotesque appear to be synonyms (this article was originally just about chimerae, but I added mention of grotesques while cleaning it up). Searching Google Books for sentence fragments, grotesque seems to be at least twice as common a term as chimera (a vs b) - suggest moving per WP:COMMONNAME. McGeddon (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. — Music1201 talk 02:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
that the image in the gallery labeled "Architectural monument, Bayern." really is a grotesgue. It is a somewhat whimsical sculpture of a monkey reading a book. That it is somewhat unlikely does not in my opinion make it a grotesque and I will remove it unless you convince me not to. Carptrash (talk) 06:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Hey! I'm a new editor and wanted to add a section on Renaissance Architecture to this article which I believe will add insight into Grotesque's. I was just wondering if anyone had any opposition to this or didn't think it was relevant. Thanks! Lwinterrrrr (talk) 22:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.
| Grotesque (architecture) (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 30 June 2022. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Choenes (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kaylee44.
— Assignment last updated by Kaylee44 (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
the section on "architectural history" appears to refer to grotesques as gargoyles by mistaking the functions of the two. The main body distinguishes the two features by their water draining properties - gargoyles - and their primarily aesthetic purposes - grotesques. Including a section that describes grotesques as also having water draining properties may be confusing. One potential way to improve the section is to note instances where grotesques have also served as water drains. Alternatively, you may want to reduce or remove the section. 205.175.118.246 (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2025 (UTC)