Talk:Partition function (quantum field theory)

Today, Talk:Partition function (quantum field theory) remains a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide audience. With the advancement of technology and social transformations, Talk:Partition function (quantum field theory) has become a central issue that impacts different aspects of our daily lives. Whether on a personal, professional or social level, Talk:Partition function (quantum field theory) continues to generate constant debate and analysis. In this article, we will explore different perspectives and approaches related to Talk:Partition function (quantum field theory), with the aim of offering a comprehensive and enriching vision on this topic that continues to capture the attention of a wide spectrum of readers.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

All the part regarding the complex valued exponential is utterly nonsense. I ask for the author to make it more readable, and to explain the reason for this nonsense. In all books about QFT I've read I never found a paragraph so arrogant, incomprensible and at the same time without any justification. Before correcting, ask yourself what's the connection between the partition function and the scattering amplitudes! 94.161.151.2 (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

The quantum fields are not interpreted as probability amplitudes

But while they can be interpreted as operators acting on a Hilbert space, they're just the normal fields in path integral formalism. The probability amplitudes are different - they're gotten as in the example given for the propagator. 24.82.134.18 (talk) 09:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)