In this article we are going to explore and analyze Talk:Paytakaran from different perspectives and in different contexts. Talk:Paytakaran is a topic that has captured the attention of people around the world, and its importance and impact are undeniable. Over the years, Talk:Paytakaran has sparked heated debates, driven significant change, and been a source of inspiration to many. In this post, we will take a deep look at Talk:Paytakaran to understand its meaning, relevance, and influence on our lives. From its origin to its evolution, Talk:Paytakaran has left an indelible mark on society, and it is essential to understand its reach in order to appreciate its true value. The objective of this article is to offer a complete and insightful overview of Talk:Paytakaran, and thus contribute to the understanding and discussion of this topic.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paytakaran article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The problem reported in the neutrality/factual accuracy tag needs to be dealt with so that the tag can be removed from the article.
Who still has a problem with the article?
Below, please quote the passages you have problems with, and explain what is wrong with them. The Transhumanist 00:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
This is what Robert H. Hewsen writes about this region:
Paytakaran
Originally a province of Media in the third-second centuries B.C., the land of the Caspians in time became an independent state called Kaspiane in Greek (Arm. Kaspk or Kasbk). Held briefly by the Artaxiad dynasty, Kaspiane was acquired by the Armenians probably in the second century A.D. Under Armenian rule the region, called P'aytakaran after its capital city, appears to have been a royal domain, that is, a part of the extensive lands that we are told the Armenian kings possessed in Azerbaijan. Undoubtedly non-Armenian in ethnic composition, P'aytakaran was lost by Armenia in 387. Thereafter, apparently under the name Balasakan, it became a permanent shahr (province) of Atrpatakan, although Sasanian Balasakan appears to have included certain other coastal areas extending far to the north of the earlier P'aytakaran. Our map differs from that of Eremyan here because he equates P'aytakaran city with the later mercantile center known to the Arabs as Baylakan, which he knew lay north of the Arax River. We have chosen, however, to follow Hakobyan and Harut'yunyan, who, with justification, we believe, see Baylakan and P'aytakaran as two separate localities and who place the latter in the Mughan Plain. Following Harut'yunyan again, we count eleven rather than ten districts in the province.
Robert H. Hewsen, Armenia: A Historical Atlas, University Of Chicago Press, 2000. ISBN 0226332284