Talk:Retrorocket

In this article, we will explore Talk:Retrorocket in depth, analyzing its impact, its relevance and its implications in today's society. From its emergence to the present, Talk:Retrorocket has captured the attention of many, generating debate and reflection in various sectors. Throughout this analysis, we will examine the key aspects that make Talk:Retrorocket a topic of interest, as well as its possible repercussions in the social, political, economic and cultural spheres. Through a comprehensive and critical vision, we will seek to fully understand the importance of Talk:Retrorocket in the current context, offering a complete overview that allows the reader to delve into its meaning and scope.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Propulsive landing is not necessarily Retro-rocket

I have never heard anyone call the engines performing Falcon 9 landings or other planned propulsive landings "Retro-rockets." These landings are performed by the same engines that brought them to space, and hence are not done by retro-rockets. Titan(moon)003 (talk) 01:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)