In this article, we will explore the fascinating world of Talk:Service Modeling Language, a topic that has captured the attention of many people over the years. Whether due to its impact on society, its relevance today or simply because of its history and evolution, Talk:Service Modeling Language represents a point of interest for various sectors of the population. Throughout these pages, we will analyze different aspects related to Talk:Service Modeling Language, from its impact on the economy to its cultural implications. Additionally, we will explore its influence on the modern world and how it has shaped our perception of Talk:Service Modeling Language over time. Get ready to immerse yourself in a world of discovery and learning!
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Cem's comment below is not dated, so it may or may not apply, but I hope the prediction for a re-write holds true. This article is certainly in need of work. The consortium has been inactive for half a year and the W3C has taken over vetting the spec delivered by the consortium. It appears that the work group is close to declaring a 'last call'. With the dormancy of the consortium, those interested in using SML would do well to reference the draft on the W3C site, not the old consortium site, serviceml.org. I will try to find time to do some work on this. The information on SML itself in the article is not egregiously wrong or distorted, but I doubt that anyone really familiar with the current state of SML would be entirely comfortable. I will try to put some work in as I find time, but I just stumbled onto this and can't do it justice now. --Vinemaple 08:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
The part about models is not helping. This is just a general discussion and not specifically related to SML. Advseb 17:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Here is a link to an article about SML. Im not going to write anything for it right now beacuse the information about it isnt substantial enough. See Here--Altrock78 10:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
In a couple of weeks this should be streamlined and re-written. In the next weeks there will be some interesting new sources on this topic for sure. Until then this article is a stub resp. a collection of raw material. User:Cem Basman