Tu banner alternativo

Talk:URI fragment

In this article we will analyze the relevance of Talk:URI fragment in the current context, exploring its implications in various areas. Talk:URI fragment has been an object of interest and study for a long time, and its influence continues to be a cause for debate and reflection. Throughout history, Talk:URI fragment has played a fundamental role in different areas, from politics to culture, technology and society in general. In this sense, it is crucial to understand the importance of Talk:URI fragment in today's world, as well as its potential to shape the future. Through an in-depth and multidisciplinary analysis, this article aims to shed light on the relevance of Talk:URI fragment today, offering a critical and reflective look at its impact and possible long-term implications.

Tu banner alternativo

Case

This article should note, or make more clear, how the case of anchors in HTML can affect this function in certain web browsers.

Goes back to an old situation where some browsers (Firefox) distinguish between upper and lower case, and some (IE) don't.

So the code

<a name = "thisanchor">

then

<A href = "#ThisAnchor">ThisAnchor</a>

will work in IE, but in Firefox the anchor value will be ignored as it "does not exist". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.88.45.5 (talk) 05:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

fix references to older draft

A format of #t=10,20 for a section of media from 10 to 20 seconds is proposed in the Media Fragments URI 1.0 W3C Working Draft.

fix this please by pointing to the newer reference I've used at some other point (speaking of W3C Proposed Recommendation) after checking that the above statement still stands for the new version — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.92.198.178 (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Does wikipedia really use :target to highlight?

The article states that "The appearance of the identified element can be changed through the :target CSS pseudoclass; Wikipedia uses this to highlight the selected reference". But, as of now, it doesn't do anything. (I'm using Chrome 51 on Windows 10, if that changes anything.) --Sincerely, Marksomnian. (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

apparently Wikipedia doesn't use such a style, but i can confirm that such a style would indeed work. KarstenBriksoftware (talk) 07:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)