In this article, we will explore Talk:Web application in depth, a topic that has sparked much interest and debate in recent years. From its origins to its impact on today's society, we will examine all aspects related to Talk:Web application to provide a comprehensive and complete overview. Through interviews, research and analysis, we will seek to better understand this topic and its influence on different areas of daily life. From its relevance in academia to its role in popular culture, Talk:Web application has captured the attention of many and has generated a series of questions and concerns that we will try to address in this article. Join us on this journey of discovery and learning about Talk:Web application!
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Web application article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good job on the rewrite and merging from "browser-based". However, I am a bit concerned about the following sentence:
It would be a good idea to provide a source for this dispute. Flash and Java applets are indeed applications delivered over the web, with code updates made only on the server-side (with the rare exception that a plug-in or JRE needs to be upgraded to a particular version, but this applies to any web applications that may utilize their resources). With no need for traditional client distribution, I don't see how they can be seen differently from a web application. One could compare the web browser to common plug-ins and the JRE (which merely make the thin client a little thicker), as being tantamount to OS fixtures, as they are so ubiquitous.
I am not looking for a back-and-forth argument here and these will be the last words I say on the matter. But I will be looking for a source. Thanks. — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 21:43, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
That sentence was based on conversations I've had with people who either work or teach in the field, so I don't have any print or web source to cite. Their argument was that a well-designed client-server system can update a thick client transparently over the internet in much the same way as you'd update a cached Java applet (what MS is trying to do with Windows Update), the difference between a browser-executed app and an OS-executed app is arbitrary (see DoJ vs. MS), and some of those "applets" get pretty darn chubby. The disinction's getting blurrier; I was trying to acknowledge that, instead of simply asserting my own position (that a browser-executed Flash app is just as much a web app as anything done with HTML & Javascript). In retrospect, "disgreement" would be better than "dispute", because no one in any of these conversations lost their temper. :) Tverbeek 23:40, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would think readers unfamiliar with the subject would find it interesting to be reminded that wikipedia itself is an example of a web app. Is there any reason why it's not mentioned here as a particularly relevant illustration (and in the Application Service Providers article)?
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the link in the word Ajax in "The practice became known as Ajax in 2005." to be for the programming practice instead of the Canadian town in Durham Region. Smeefers (talk) 18:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Done PianoDan (talk) 18:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2024 and 5 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nfarrow93 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Nfarrow93 (talk) 01:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)