In this article, we will explore Template:AfC submission from various angles and perspectives with the aim of thoroughly understanding its importance, impact and relevance in the current context. We will highlight the different facets and dimensions of Template:AfC submission, examining its influence in various fields and its interaction with other elements that shape our reality. Through a detailed and exhaustive analysis, we will reveal the complexity and depth of Template:AfC submission, offering a comprehensive vision that allows us to fully appreciate its meaning. Using a holistic approach, we will approach Template:AfC submission from a multifaceted perspective, inviting the reader to immerse themselves in a journey of discovery and understanding that broadens their horizons and enriches their knowledge on this topic.
| Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2–3 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 659 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| This template is used on approximately 40,000 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
| If you plan to make breaking changes to this template, including moving it, changing its scope, or nominating it for deletion or deprecation, please notify the Article Alerts project at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts as a courtesy, as this page is used by the AAlertBot bot to detect and report pages. Thank you! |
| This template may have no transclusions. This is because it is substituted by a tool or script, it is used as part of a short-term or less active Wikipedia process, or for some other reason. |
| This template uses Lua: |
| This template uses TemplateStyles: |
This template is meant as a single template for marking the status of an Articles for creation submission. To use this template to submit an article for review, use {{subst:submit|username}}, where username is the username of the draft's creator (left blank it will assume it is you). The template uses one of the following parameter options:
reject parameter is passed with some valueWhen declining an AfC submission, this template can take additional parameters to include a decline reason. All decline templates used under the old system (listed here) are included in this template. The idea is to streamline the decline process; instead of including three templates, now a reviewer need only add a single parameter to the template to include a decline reason.
To include the decline reason, use {{AfC submission|D|reason}}, replacing reason with one of the abbreviations listed at Template:AfC submission/comments. That page also shows the resulting messages. Some reasons may take an additional parameter ({{AfC submission|D|reason|Additional parameter}}). These parameters are optional, except the additional parameter for reason itself.
If no parameter is included after D, or an invalid parameter is entered, the invalid parameter will appear as the decline reason.
See Special:PrefixIndex/Template:AfC submission/