Template:No reliable sources
Today, Template:No reliable sources is a topic that has captured the attention of people of all ages and backgrounds. Since its emergence, Template:No reliable sources has generated increasing interest and has become a central element in the discussion of various aspects of daily life. Whether in the workplace, in education, in politics or in entertainment, Template:No reliable sources has proven to be a relevant and current topic that deserves to be analyzed in depth. In this article, we will explore different perspectives on Template:No reliable sources and examine its impact on today's society.
 | This article does not cite any reliable sources. Reliable sources are necessary to demonstrate that a particular subject is notable enough to warrant an article. (December 2025) |
Usage
This maintenance template should be placed at the top of any article which includes one or more sources, but where all of these sources are what Wikipedia considers to be patently unreliable (e.g., Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, IMDb, Twitter, etc.). The person placing the tag does not need to have conducted a search to establish whether or not reliable sources actually exist. Once this article contains at least one bonafide reliable source, this template should be removed from it-- anyone may remove it, including the article's creator, if that condition has been met.
Note that an article that has no reliable sources is not the same as one which has sources, some of which are unreliable (in which case the {{Unreliable sources}} template is more appropriate), nor is it completely unreferenced (a situation which is covered by the {{Unreferenced}} template).
This maintenance tag should not be used as an alternative to initiating a deletion discussion for non-notable subjects. If an editor conducts a reasonable search for reliable sources and cannot find at least two, the article is likely appropriate for deletion. Do not place this tag on the article if a search for reliable sources has been conducted and come back empty handed or if only one reliable source seems to exist.