In today's world, Template:User-generated source has become a topic of great relevance and interest to many people. From its origins to its impact on today's society, Template:User-generated source has sparked curiosity and debate in different areas. Throughout history, Template:User-generated source has played a fundamental role in various cultures and has evolved over time, adapting to the needs and demands of each era. In this article, we will explore the origins, influence and impact of Template:User-generated source, as well as its relevance today and its projection in the future.
This template is used on approximately 5,500 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
{{User-generated source|date=May 2024}}
This is an inline citation cleanup template used inside <ref>...</ref>
to flag a source as user-generated content (e.g. another wiki, a content farm, or a user-editable database like IMDb—in other words, a crowdsourced reference), and thus potentially unreliable, per WP:Identifying reliable sources#User-generated content (WP:Verifiability#Self-published sources and WP:Neutral point of view are also relevant, but the template's link to goes to that anchor at the reliable sources guideline).
This template will categorize tagged articles into Category:Accuracy disputes.
To flag blocks of information as questionably sourced in this manner, use Template:User-generated inline, outside of <ref>...</ref>
. For whole sections or articles, use Template:Self-published.