Template talk:Academic ranks

In this article we are going to delve into the topic of Template talk:Academic ranks, a topic that has sparked interest and debate in recent times. _Var1 has acquired relevance due to its impact in various areas, from politics to science, including culture and society in general. Throughout this article we will analyze the different perspectives that exist on Template talk:Academic ranks, offering a complete and objective overview that allows the reader to form an informed opinion on the subject. Additionally, we will explore the origin and evolution of Template talk:Academic ranks, as well as its relevance in the current context. Without a doubt, Template talk:Academic ranks constitutes a topic of great importance that deserves to be addressed carefully and objectively, and it is precisely the purpose of this article to offer a complete and detailed vision of this topic that is so relevant today.

Undergraduate, graduate?

Any reason why that such is not included? PPEMES (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

As far as the U. S. is concerned, I’m not aware of any academic ranks that correspond or corresponded formally with teaching either graduate or undergraduate students. Higher ranks of course more often taught graduate students than lower ranks did, but the difference is fuzzy and varies quite a bit from one school to another. deisenbe (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I meant plain B.Sc. etc. PPEMES (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand what your query is. deisenbe (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Why is only academic ranks post Doctor indicated in this template? PPEMES (talk) 20:06, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
That's not correct. Many ranks would be held by people with less than the doctorate. In the U.S., a lecturer or instructor would probably not have a doctorate. deisenbe (talk)

Why is not Bachelors and Masters included in this template? PPEMES (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)