Template talk:Barrow-in-Furness
In today's world, Template talk:Barrow-in-Furness is a relevant topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. Since its emergence, Template talk:Barrow-in-Furness has generated a series of debates and discussions about its impact on various aspects of daily life. Its influence extends to multiple fields, from politics and economics to culture and society. In this article, we will explore the phenomenon of Template talk:Barrow-in-Furness in depth, analyzing its many facets and its implications in today's world. Through a comprehensive approach, we will try to shed light on this complex and dynamic topic, offering the reader a more complete and insightful view of Template talk:Barrow-in-Furness.
Hello template talk,
I'm a little concerned as to the quality of navigation and context in this template. There are alot of links to sections and subsections of articles, whilst there are also a great many deadlinks.
I'm worried too about some of the content and context in "Geography" specifically - terms like historic county and region are used (piped) to subjective, unofficial territories. These are almost certainly going to have to go asap.
It's one of the more unusual navigations templates I've found, and wondered if there'd be any objections with a trim/toning down? -- Jza84 · (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'd say remove anything that links to a section of an article as that is pretty much unusual usage. Lots of this is stuff that should just be prose in the articles concerned. MRSC • Talk 14:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)