Template talk:Chinese Legalism

In today's article we will explore the exciting world of Template talk:Chinese Legalism, a topic that has captured the attention of people of all ages and backgrounds. From its impact on society to its relevance today, Template talk:Chinese Legalism has generated endless debates, research and discoveries that have enriched our understanding of this topic. Whether you are passionate about Template talk:Chinese Legalism or simply interested in learning more about it, this article will give you a complete and up-to-date look at this fascinating topic. Get ready to immerse yourself in the world of Template talk:Chinese Legalism and discover everything it has to offer us!

WikiProject iconChina Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I'm wondering why Fengjian is considered a "relevant article" in the Legalism series. Legalism is only mentioned in the article in the context of "it is often conflated with Confucianism and Legalism".

Let's lean into the anachronism and pretend for a mome that Legalism was a coherent political philosophy contemporaneous to the fengjian administrative system. If anything, they're oppositional: it's the political outcomes related to Legalist positions, chiefly the central concentration of power, that leads to the decline of fengjian, which was overarchingly aristocratic. It's the most Legalist states that get us to the junxian system. Leaning back out of the anachronism, by the times of the founders of Legalism (which, leaning back out of that anachronism, was coined by Sima Tan), fengjian was already in decline. The two concepts do have some interrelation, but a. not to the point where fengjian belongs in the Legalism template, and b. not in the way where fengjian belongs in the Legalism template.

Very tempted to remove and will probably do so soon barring objection. Folly Mox (talk) 19:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)