Tu banner alternativo

Template talk:Computational physics

In today's world, Template talk:Computational physics remains a topic of great importance and interest to a wide public. Whether it is the life of Template talk:Computational physics, a historical event related to Template talk:Computational physics, or simply exploring the various facets of Template talk:Computational physics, it is evident that this topic continues to spark curiosity and generate debate. From its impact on society to its influence on culture and politics, Template talk:Computational physics remains a relevant topic that deserves to be explored in depth. In this article, we will delve into the various dimensions of Template talk:Computational physics and analyze its meaning and relevance today.

Tu banner alternativo

You could probably unlock this page template now, I would like to add a few more scientists responsible for the development of Computational Fluid Dyanmics 128.156.10.80 (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Mike134

I have a few ideas for a few more scientists; how about Stanislaw Ulam and Aneesur Rahman (creator of MD)? 41.58.9.48 (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Hell yes - Ulam was such a crucial figure he just *has* to be on this list. Ema--or (talk) 02:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

The list of potentials

Hey, I just came across this template, and think the list of potentials leaves out some honourable mentions, specifically the Mie potential, Stockmayer potential, Buckingham potential, Hard sphere potential, and Sutherland potential although the latter (sadly) doesn't have a page yet. I can imagine that you want to keep this list somewhat exclusive, otherwise it would just grow out of control, but I believe the ones mentioned are so central to modern and historical developments in physics and physical chemistry that it feels strange to leave them out. ItsBigBoat (talk) 21:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)