Template talk:Consulting

This article will address the topic of Template talk:Consulting, which has generated great interest due to its relevance today. Template talk:Consulting is a topic that has aroused the interest of many people in different areas, whether in the personal, academic, professional or social sphere. Over the years, Template talk:Consulting has gained greater importance and relevance, generating debates, research and reflections on its impact and consequences in our society. In this sense, it is essential to analyze and understand the different aspects surrounding Template talk:Consulting, from its origins to its evolution today, in order to offer a broad and complete vision of this very relevant topic.

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This template was accepted from this draft on 14 October 2016 by reviewer KGirlTrucker81 (talk · contribs).

April 2 edit

Please see diff: I removed several entries that are either private or on the smaller side. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Criteria for inclusion?

Stumbled upon this template, and it seems to have deviated greatly from its draft upon creation, which, I'm assuming, largely relied on areas of expertise and other principles. Looks like the template now has loads of different firms and individuals—not something you see very often in WP templates. Take Template:Communism for example. I am sure several more leaders, concepts, etc. could be added to the template (it already has enough imo), but most of the links include concepts, principles, and even related topics, with only a limited number of individuals who had a tremendous impact on the communist movement. It seems that this template has deviated from its original purpose and pretty much any reputable firm (subjective) can be added to the list, by virtue that they engage in consulting. Seems most appropriate to nix the firms and leave everything else.
TLDR, is there a criteria for this template, or are folks just adding any multinational consulting firms to the template? Thanks. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)