In this article, we will explore the fascinating world of Template talk:Current G20 leaders. From its origins to its relevance today, we will delve into the most relevant and unknown aspects of this phenomenon. Through a detailed and rigorous analysis, we will try to shed light on Template talk:Current G20 leaders and its impact in different areas. Along these lines, we will discover how Template talk:Current G20 leaders has evolved over time, as well as the implications it has on our society. Without a doubt, this article will be an indispensable guide to understanding the importance of Template talk:Current G20 leaders in the contemporary world.
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Do we put the EU Commission President or the Council President as the European Leader? Therequiembellishere (talk) 22:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Do we really need flags for all the leaders here. Images is a bad way to convey information that is important since it makes it harder for the color blind, difficult for screen readers, and for print outs. See WP:ACCESS. It also look horrible. Rettetast (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
There are plausible reasons for modifying the navbox templates at the bottom of the page at G-20 major economies. An opportunity for discussion needs to be part of any process which precedes change. Three arguable improvements are:
A. Combining two of the current navboxes at the bottom of the page?
B. Deleting the current leaders navbox?
C.Standardize/harmonize to "G20" without hyphen?
D. Perhaps decision-making may be helped by comparing an array of similar groups and templates?
|
|
What is the best next step for this article? for similar articles? --Tenmei (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)