In this article, we will explore the fascinating world of Template talk:Electronics industry in Japan, analyzing its impact on society and its relevance today. From its origins to its evolution today, Template talk:Electronics industry in Japan has been the subject of study and debate in different areas, generating growing interest from academics, professionals and enthusiasts. Through a deep and detailed look, we will examine the various aspects related to Template talk:Electronics industry in Japan, its influence on popular culture, its role in technological development and its importance in the global panorama. Likewise, we will address the different perspectives and opinions around Template talk:Electronics industry in Japan, with the aim of offering a comprehensive and complete vision of this exciting topic.
Electronics Template‑class | |||||||
|
Japan Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
Category:Electronics companies of Japan is already there. What is this template for? There needs to be a clear definition of which companies/brands should and shouldn't be in the template.--Krtek2125 20:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. This template is a mess, as it includes brands (e.g. National) and parent companies (e.g. Panasonic). I think brands and also companies that has long since exited the electronics market (e.g. Sega) shouldn't be listed. I think this template needs to be updated in addition to this article --Aizuku (talk) 05:24, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
I still think it needs to be simpler, maybe categorize companies, since there are more specialized companies like Nikon and Nintendo, and diversified companies like Sony and Toshiba. --12:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aizuku (talk • contribs)
The following is just an idea, a hint of how it should be, the categories are not final, only meant as an illustration:
In this example I've listed some companies more than once, where valid, I'm not sure if this is for the best or not.
--Aizuku (talk) 12:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Removed Technics, Quasar and National since they are Panasonic brands, removed Buffalo since it redirects to Melco. Added JVC Kenwood Holdings. I think sub-brands of a company shouldn't be listed. --Aizuku (talk) 08:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Commented Minolta out, there is already an entry for Konica Minolta, and Konica didn't exist on the template before. It was only logical. --Aizuku (talk) 12:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
The current template includes Business-to-business companies. The products of Advantest, Horiba, Tokyo Electron, and Yokogawa Electric are definitely not consumer electronics, so they should be removed. I support Aizuku's proposal. --Shinkansen Fan (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)