In this article, we will carefully explore the topic of Template talk:Functional groups, with the purpose of offering a broad and complete vision of its importance and relevance in the current context. Through in-depth analysis, we will address various perspectives and approaches that will allow the reader to fully understand the complexity and implications of Template talk:Functional groups in different contexts. Along these lines, we will delve into fundamental aspects related to Template talk:Functional groups, providing relevant information, statistical data and expert opinions that will enrich knowledge around this topic. In addition, we will examine practical cases and personal experiences that will concretely illustrate the influence of Template talk:Functional groups in contemporary society. This article will undoubtedly be essential reading for those interested in deeply understanding the various dimensions of Template talk:Functional groups.
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
The result of the move request was: moved as requested, unopposed. Dekimasuよ! 21:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Functional group → Template:Functional groups – The name of this nav template is inherently plural, like any category, and in keeping with the title it displays. A876 (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Isn't nitrite also a functional group similar to nitro? in here it says that nitrite is group similar to nitro but it bonds differently (R-O-N=O instead of R-N(-O)-O). I think we should add it too. אלון סול (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Should not the § See also-list be in this template, as articles:
? DePiep (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
I would like to add reductone to this list, any objections? —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 11:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)