Tu banner alternativo

Template talk:Functional groups

In this article, we will carefully explore the topic of Template talk:Functional groups, with the purpose of offering a broad and complete vision of its importance and relevance in the current context. Through in-depth analysis, we will address various perspectives and approaches that will allow the reader to fully understand the complexity and implications of Template talk:Functional groups in different contexts. Along these lines, we will delve into fundamental aspects related to Template talk:Functional groups, providing relevant information, statistical data and expert opinions that will enrich knowledge around this topic. In addition, we will examine practical cases and personal experiences that will concretely illustrate the influence of Template talk:Functional groups in contemporary society. This article will undoubtedly be essential reading for those interested in deeply understanding the various dimensions of Template talk:Functional groups.

Tu banner alternativo

Requested move 15 December 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested, unopposed. Dekimasuよ! 21:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)


Template:Functional groupTemplate:Functional groups – The name of this nav template is inherently plural, like any category, and in keeping with the title it displays. A876 (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Move target corrected (Templates do not belong in article namespace}. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting this request. I accidentally requested move of "over" the existing redirecting article . You are correct. I meant to request the move "over" the existing redirecting template . -A876 (talk) 18:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Nitrite

Isn't nitrite also a functional group similar to nitro? in here it says that nitrite is group similar to nitro but it bonds differently (R-O-N=O instead of R-N(-O)-O). I think we should add it too. אלון סול (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

The See also list

Should not the § See also-list be in this template, as articles:

? DePiep (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Reductone

I would like to add reductone to this list, any objections? —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 11:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)