Template talk:International volleyball

This article will address the topic of Template talk:International volleyball, which is extremely relevant and interesting today. Template talk:International volleyball is a topic that has generated great debate and has captured the attention of many people in different fields. Throughout history, Template talk:International volleyball has been the object of study, analysis and reflection, which has contributed to its evolution and understanding in a current context. Furthermore, Template talk:International volleyball has played a significant role in the lives of many people, directly or indirectly impacting various aspects of society. Therefore, it is essential to explore and delve into the importance and relevance of Template talk:International volleyball, as well as its implications and consequences today.

WikiProject iconVolleyball Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Overlink

We don't need a link to Africa here, it's a common term, and the Africa article does not include this template. Frietjes (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Please maintain a consistent look for all relevant wiki templates. You can't re-format every templates because you don't like the existing format. Those templates were formatted in a way deemed appropriate by their respective communities. 120.16.1.186 (talk) 16:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
I am part of that community, and this is not a WP:WALLEDGARDEN. I am sure someone else will come along and fix it, but right now you are edit warring. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes you are, but you can't change every templates. There isn't a universally agreed solution in Wikipedia, you have to maintain a consistent look for similar articles/templates even if you think they do not "look right". They have been formatted that way and stayed that way for quite a long time now. You can't change the whole thing, you just can't. If you don't believe me, do a bit of research yourself. 120.16.1.186 (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Jonas kam and Frietjes on this one per MOS:ITALICS and WP:SPECIFICLINK. You should get consensus here before re-adding these links. And it appears you have already been warned, so the next would probably result in a block. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)