Nowadays, Template talk:Monarchs of Poland is a topic that has gained great relevance in various areas. Its impact has been such that more and more people are interested in learning more about Template talk:Monarchs of Poland and its implications. From its origins to its present day, Template talk:Monarchs of Poland has been the subject of analysis and debate, showing its influence on society, culture and the economy. In this article, we will further explore the phenomenon of Template talk:Monarchs of Poland and its many facets, with the goal of better understanding its scope and possible repercussions in the future.
Poland Template‑class | |||||||
|
Biography: Royalty and Nobility Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Russian emperors should be included in the list, as they were accepted as kings of Poland by all the contemporary states of Europe. They were of German blood from the Holstein-Gottorp dynasty, so I don't see why August I and August II of the Saxon Wettins should be included in the list, and Alexander I and Nicholas I shouldn't. Nicholas I was crowned as king of Poland with the crown of the Piasts in Warsaw in 1829. Ghirlandajo 06:20, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Wouldn't it make more sense to use a succession table than this template, which is huge and awkward? john k 19:32, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This template was listed for deletion on Templates for Deletion. The decision was to keep this template. Please see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Not deleted/May 2005 for more information.
I suggest we change the title of the template to "Polish Monarchs". The current title gives the impression that it is an enumeration of all of Poland's dukes, high dukes, and kings, which is obviously not the case.
I want to change the template so that the monarchs are divided into dynasties. This will make it a bit bigger, but there are plenty of big templates on WP (like Template:Region). I still need to add the image of the Eagle that's in the current template. Let me know what you think. Appleseed 16:06, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Krak and Polpiel should be omitted, these are fairy tales. First on list as a legendary (or semi-legendary) monarch should be Siemowit Radomil talk 14:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)