Template talk:Neighbourhoods of Karachi

In today's world, Template talk:Neighbourhoods of Karachi is a topic that has gained great relevance in all areas of society. From politics to technology, culture and economics, Template talk:Neighbourhoods of Karachi has significantly impacted the way we live and relate. Over the years, Template talk:Neighbourhoods of Karachi has sparked passionate debates and brought about profound changes in the way we approach different aspects of our daily lives. In this article, we will explore the different facets of Template talk:Neighbourhoods of Karachi and analyze its influence in different areas, in order to better understand its impact on today's society.

WikiProject iconPakistan: Karachi Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Karachi, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Notes

  • This template for use in the respective pages of the Neighborhoods of Karachi, a city in Pakistan requires further refinement. --Bhadani 14:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Adding redlines is not prudent. It would be better to expand the existing ones, and add links for which at least a stub of few sentences exist. However, if someone desires to add redline, he should do that correctly, as a wrong addition would reflect on about 200 pages and shall look bad and lower wikipedia's presentation. --Bhadani 12:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

this template....is....sheesh!

man, this template is way, way, WAY too big. i mean, this is why there is a categories page. how does this help anyone who is trying to navigate? or see an article through the half page chunk of template? JoeSmack Talk(p-review!) 17:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)