In today's world, Template talk:Neolithic is a topic that has acquired significant relevance in various fields of study. Whether in the scientific, cultural, historical or social realm, Template talk:Neolithic has captured the attention of academics, experts and enthusiasts alike. Its impact extends over time and encompasses a wide range of perspectives, from the individual to the collective, thus allowing a deep and reflective analysis of its meaning and consequences. In this article, we will explore different facets and approaches of Template talk:Neolithic, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and enriching vision of this topic that is so relevant today.
I have no idea why the previous talks were deleted. We certainly are not through talking. I don't know what was said before. Not interested. This box is a list of Neolithic cultures arranged by region. That list could be a lot longer than it is and should be. The length might create a useability problem. Now, the Chalcolithic never was, is not, and probably never will be part of the Neolithic due to its proclivity to copper. Neolithic is stone age. Stone is not copper, never will be. We can get some space for the genuinely stone stone age by taking out this chalcolithic material. If no one objects I plan to do that. It makes sense does it not?Dave (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Please Change The Template... Put It Hide On Print... This Table Don't Work With the (Print/Export -> Download As Pdf) Because Table Is To Wide... Thank You! thats great thanks!!!!!!!!!!!😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.195.57.126 (talk) 16:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
The article speak about Europe but divide Asia. - 2804:18:16:36D6:105D:F0C5:C2D:9C44 (talk) 16:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC).