In today's world, Template talk:Number systems has gained great relevance in different areas. Whether on a personal, professional or social level, Template talk:Number systems has become a topic of constant interest and discussion. Its impact is notable in various areas, from technology to politics, including culture and interpersonal relationships. This is why it is essential to analyze and understand the influence that Template talk:Number systems has on our current society. In this article, we will explore different perspectives and aspects related to Template talk:Number systems, in order to shed light on its importance and the role it plays in our daily lives.
Numbers | ||||
|
First of all, I merely designed the navigation box, and did not want to be bothered with mathematical discussions about what should be in it and what not. I just put everything in that was in the {{numbers}}. To begin with, I think stuff like Pi and E, which are numbers, not sets of numbers should not be included. SuperMidget (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
This may be a stupid question, but that's why I'm putting it in the talk page rather than Being Bold. Should the second line end Hyperreal numbers · Superreal numbers · Surreal numbers ? My understanding is that, in short, hyperreals ⊂ superreals ⊂ surreals, and the first line is ordered in increasing broadness, so to speak.71.235.238.160 (talk) 20:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Tessarines (also known as bicomplex numbers) is a system hypercomplex numbers, similar to quaternions. The article about tessarines is much larger than that of some systems already included in this template, such as Sedenions. The article also features a long list of sources about tessarines, greatly exceeding that of some other included systems. The article also highlights fresh scientific results for tessarine system from 2009 papers and applications in physics from 2004, 2006 and 2008. This numerical system was already included in this article but was removed in a series massive removal edits by user R.e.b. who characterized this system as 'not notable'. His edits were partially reverted later: by JohnBlackburne who restored the most of deleted numerical systems.
I am not an editor of the article about tessatines or otherwise involved user, but just wonder why Arthur Rubin tries to remove this numerical system from this article while keeping completely analogous quaternions which differ only in sign of j^2? This is even dispite the fact that reviously Arthur Rubin was OK with tessarines: --178.140.84.25 (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
They appear to be of only historical interest. From an intrinsically mathematical viewpoint:
- They're not used in modern mathematics
- They don't arise naturally as a solution to a mathematical problem
- They are quite ill-behaved algebraically, being non-associative, non-commutative and lacking a distributive norm.
They may be notable enough to deserve an article, but only for historical reasons. I suggest removing them from this template, as it otherwise overstates their importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.69.7.176 (talk) 11:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I've added a section for the planar hypercomplex numbers. A problem might be that I've ended up repeating the complex numbers and split-complex numbers. --Svennik (talk) 09:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)