In today's article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Template talk:Outline footer. From its origins to its relevance today, we will explore every aspect of this topic with the goal of providing a complete and exhaustive analysis. We will discover its multiple facets, its implications in different areas and its possible future projections. Through a holistic vision, we will approach Template talk:Outline footer from various perspectives in order to provide the reader with a deeper and richer understanding. It doesn't matter if you are an expert in the subject or just have a casual interest; In this article you will find valuable information that will invite you to reflect and delve deeper into the exciting world of Template talk:Outline footer.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Outline footer template. |
|
Portals | ||||||||||
|
Outlines NA‑class | |||||||
|
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Template:Outline footer → Template:Outlines – Per template's current title (and "footer" not necessary) --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 08:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Sardanaphalus (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.Footers normally to a grouped collection of Wikipedia articles. Particularly when that group would list each other in the 'See also' section. This however points to several locations on the same portal page. What is the advantage over just using {{portalbar|Contents/Outlines}}
Any comments? Jonpatterns (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)