In today's world, Template talk:Rulers of Hanover has become a topic of constant conversation and general interest. Whether due to its impact on society, its relevance in the professional field or its impact on personal life, Template talk:Rulers of Hanover has captured the attention of a wide spectrum of the public. Furthermore, its influence extends to multiple areas, from technology to culture, through politics and economics. As Template talk:Rulers of Hanover continues to evolve and take on new dimensions, it is crucial to analyze its nature and understand its scope. This article will seek to explore different aspects of Template talk:Rulers of Hanover and offer a comprehensive view of its importance today.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lower Saxony, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Lower SaxonyWikipedia:WikiProject Lower SaxonyTemplate:WikiProject Lower SaxonyLower Saxony articles
This article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Inconsistency
All the Georges who were also King of England (and I still call the British Crown the English Crown because it is in the numbering scheme of William of Normandy as Founder of the State of England) are with their numerals as King of England, except for "George Louis" who was also George I of Britain/England. Meanwhile, the Williams are listed with their numerals as King of Hanover. These inconsistencies need to be corrected. This is too confusing. -The Mysterious El Willstro 209.183.186.13 (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
William IV?
William IV of the United Kingdom certainly used that ordinal in the United Kingdom, but did he use it in Hanover? Did he use it as King of Hanover in situations where the United Kingdom was not mentioned along with Hanover? If so, wouldn't it be less confusing if we removed the pipes and named the rulers "George I of Great Britain", , "William IV of the United Kingdom", "Ernest Augustus I of Hanover", "George V of Hanover"? Surtsicna (talk) 15:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
