Template talk:Split dab

This time, we will explore the fascinating world of Template talk:Split dab. From its origins to its impact on today's society, Template talk:Split dab has been the object of study, debate and admiration. Whether through his contributions in a specific field, his influence on popular culture, or his relevance in history, Template talk:Split dab has left an indelible mark on the world. Throughout this article, we will dive into a deep and detailed analysis of Template talk:Split dab, exploring its many facets and offering a new perspective on its importance today. Get ready to discover everything there is to know about Template talk:Split dab!

WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconAnthroponymy Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Anomalous behavior between template:split dab and template:disambig|split

There are two pages in ].

  • Chai enters the category because it includes {{disambig|geo|given name|callsign|split}}
  • NED enters the category because it includes {{split dab}}

The anomaly is that only NED displays at the top "It has been suggested that this disambiguation page be split into multiple pages. (Discuss)". If there are to be different templates that have the effect of putting a page in this category, they ought to behave the same in how they affect the display of pages where they are used.

I also posted this at Template Talk:Disambiguation, and I suggest that further comments go there, because that is the template that should probably be fixed —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)