Today, Template talk:Transport in Buckinghamshire is a topic of great interest and relevance in today's society. The impact of Template talk:Transport in Buckinghamshire extends to different aspects of daily life, generating debates, research and reflections in different areas. It is important to deeply analyze Template talk:Transport in Buckinghamshire to understand its influence and find possible solutions to the challenges it poses. In this article, we will explore in detail the various aspects of Template talk:Transport in Buckinghamshire, addressing its implications in different contexts and offering a comprehensive view of this significant topic. Along these lines, we will delve into a critical analysis of Template talk:Transport in Buckinghamshire, seeking to understand its scope and project its possible consequences in the future.
Buckinghamshire NA‑class (inactive) | |||||||
|
Transport Template‑class | |||||||
|
I wonder if a better place for this would be under 'junctions', because of all the roundabouts. It is not a brilliant suggestion, but it certainly doesn't belong under (national) Primary Routes. Only two of them are primary routes (A421 and A509), the rest are minor As (A4146, A422), Bs or Cs. Alternatively, delete it. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
This template is getting to be pretty huge, so as part of my planned Transport in Milton Keynes article, I'm proposing the idea of breaking all of the Milton Keynes bits of this template off into a separate template. That will help integrate together all of the MK-related articles and make this oversized template somewhat more manageable.Tom walker (talk) 00:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Ah. I just discovered this discussion having already created Template:Transport in Milton Keynes per a discussion on Talk:MK Metro. Is this OK, or would it be better to delete it? Alzarian16 (talk) 13:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
It is fully in accordance with WP standards to have nested templates, and this is particularly appropriate where there is a large urban area with its own identity. We should definitely have 'Transport in MK' which is nested under 'Milton Keynes and under 'Transport in Bucks'. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2010 (UTC)