In today's world, Template talk:United States Congresses is a topic that has gained more and more relevance and attention. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance or its importance for personal development, Template talk:United States Congresses has become a topic of interest for people of all ages and backgrounds. In this article, we will explore the various facets of Template talk:United States Congresses, from its origin to its implications today. We will analyze its evolution over time, its influence in different areas and its possible projections for the future. Template talk:United States Congresses is a topic that incites us to reflect, debate and deep analysis, and that is why it is essential to understand all its dimensions.
United States: Government Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
U.S. Congress Template‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
In my edit today I left the columns as rearranged in blocks of 10 years. I can see how that might be the most understandable. However, the previous blocks of 9 years provided a more even distribution and largely matched the recognized historical eras of US history. Perhaps too esoteric for WP, but something to consider. stilltim 13:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Template:USCongresses has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — —Markles 12:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Stilltim, why'd you remove the future congresses?—Markles 02:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Dope slaps aside, I again think it's time to put future Congresses back on this template. The 2008 elections are looming and therefore so is the 111th Congress. These articles are not red-linked: they are active. Let the users decide if they don't want to use the links. Sure the 111th isn't that important, but there are many people out there who don't care about the 8th, 23rd, or 46th, either! Comments?—Markles 19:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Before I nominate this for renaming, I want to discuss it here.
There aren't terms of Congress. They are individucal Congresses.
Thus, I suggest we restore the name, {{USCongresses}}. Support/Oppose/Discuss? —Markles 23:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Rather than having 11 columns of 10 links and 1 column of 2 links, why not balance the columns better? It looks strange to me having all that blank space there at the end of the last column. Qqqqqq (talk) 17:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)