Template talk:WikiProject Languages

In this article, we will explore the fascinating history of Template talk:WikiProject Languages, a topic that has captured the attention of countless people over the years. Template talk:WikiProject Languages has been the subject of debate, study and speculation, and its impact on society has been profound and lasting. From the earliest historical records to the present day, Template talk:WikiProject Languages has played a critical role in shaping culture, politics, and the way we understand the world around us. Throughout these pages, we will delve into the rich and diverse history of Template talk:WikiProject Languages, exploring its origins, evolution, and its relevance in the modern world.

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Languages This template is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage

messed up layout

I've seen some talk pages where it's messed up, and displays a very low width, making it extremely long and ugly. Why does it do that? I think it's probably something to do with the job queue because previewing those pages will make it display normally, maybe I'm wrong? -- 120.17.168.146 (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

dialects

Dialect articles may benefit from infoboxes, but they're often not necessary. The same for historical forms. Could we add options of "dialect" and "historical" for that field that would generate subcats, so the main category would be populated by distinct language articles? The current 250 articles are a bit much to wade through. — kwami (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2013 (UTC)