Today, The Mark of the Whistler is a topic of great relevance and interest. Since its emergence, it has captured the attention of many people and has become a point of discussion in various areas. This phenomenon has sparked the interest of experts and enthusiasts alike, generating extensive debate about its implications and consequences. The Mark of the Whistler has proven to have a significant impact on modern society, and its influence is becoming increasingly evident in different aspects of daily life. In this article, we will thoroughly explore The Mark of the Whistler and its relevance in the current context, analyzing its evolution, challenges and possible future scenarios.
The Mark of the Whistler | |
---|---|
Directed by | William Castle |
Screenplay by | George Bricker |
Story by | Cornell Woolrich (short story "Dead Account") |
Based on | The Whistler 1942-55 radio series by J. Donald Wilson |
Produced by | Rudolph C. Flothow |
Starring | Richard Dix Janis Carter |
Narrated by | Otto Forrest |
Cinematography | George Meehan |
Edited by | Reg Browne |
Music by | Mario Castelnuovo-Tedesco |
Production company | Larry Darmour Productions |
Distributed by | Columbia Pictures |
Release date |
|
Running time | 60 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
The Mark of the Whistler, (aka The Marked Man) is a 1944 American mystery film noir based on the radio drama The Whistler. Directed by William Castle, the production features Richard Dix, Porter Hall and Janis Carter. It is the second of Columbia Pictures' eight "Whistler" films produced in the 1940s, all but the last starring Dix.
A drifter claims the money in a dormant bank account. Later, he becomes the target of men who are the sons of the man's old partner, who is now in prison due to a conflict with him over the money.
Bosley Crowther, the film critic for The New York Times, gave the film a mixed review, writing "The dodges by which a fellow successfully stakes a phony claim to a dormant account in a savings bank and swindles $29,000 lend some fair to middling interest to Columbia's latest Whistler-series film—one called The Mark of the Whistler...In this dubious demonstration, the film does present a criminal case with the patient documentation familiar in crime-and-punishment shorts. But the things that happen to this defrauder after he has got the cash are just the claptrap of cheap melodrama—and they are bluntly presented that way."