In the article that we present below, we are going to address the topic of Two-level defense in a broad and detailed way. Two-level defense is a topic that has generated great interest and debate in recent years due to its importance in today's society. Throughout this article, we will analyze different aspects related to Two-level defense, from its historical origin to its relevance in the contemporary world. In addition, we will explore various perspectives and opinions of experts in the field, with the aim of offering a complete and in-depth vision of Two-level defense. Without a doubt, this article will be very useful for those who wish to learn more about this topic and its implications today.
In American football, a two-level defense is a defensive formation with only two layers of defense instead of the customary three layers.[1]
In a standard three-level defense, there are three layers: the forcing unit (consisting mainly of linemen but possibly also including blitzing linebackers and defensive backs), the underneath coverage (usually consisting of linebackers but possibly including other players, especially in the case of a zone blitz), and the contain unit (mostly defensive backs). A two-level defense does away with the contain unit in favor of increased pressure on the offense. Two-level defenses will often use one deep safety (as deep as 28 yards at the snap) to enforce an end line on the offense, but the 46 defense (aka "Bear 4-6"), most famously employed by the Chicago Bears in the 1980s, is a two level defense with contain handled solely by the single coverage skills of the cornerbacks. The "Bear" can also function as a three-level defense, and indeed concealment of the defensive structure is a key to making this defense work.
The two-level was invented to combat the run and shoot offense in the 1980s, but has stayed in use due to its adaptability in combating all types of offenses. The defense of spread formations remains a strong suit of this model.