In today's world, UPI small college football rankings has become a topic of interest to many people. Since its inception, UPI small college football rankings has captured the attention of individuals of all ages and backgrounds, generating debates, conversations and reflections around its impact on society. Its presence has become evident in different areas, from popular culture to politics, including science, technology and the arts. UPI small college football rankings has managed to transcend barriers and borders, becoming an element that is present in the daily lives of millions of people around the world. With important implications at a global level, UPI small college football rankings has positioned itself as a relevant topic that deserves to be analyzed and discussed from different perspectives. In this article, we will explore the various aspects related to UPI small college football rankings, analyzing its impact, its challenges and possible solutions to the challenges it poses.
The UPI small college football rankings was a system used by the United Press International (UPI) from 1958 to 1974 to rank the best small college football teams in the United States.
The UPI announced in September 1958 that it had formed a Small-College Football Rating Board consisting of 47 coaches charged on a weekly basis with ranking the nation's best "small college" football teams. The initial board was made up of one coach from each of 47 states. Each coach was asked to submit a weekly ballot ranking the ten best teams out of the 519 small-college football programs. The rankings included schools that were members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), members of the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA), and members of both or neither. The team ranked No. 1 at the end of the year was presented with a trophy by the UPI.
Top teams in final polls
The following chart lists the top five teams in the final UPI small college rankings for each year from 1958 to 1974. The figures in brackets reflect the number of first-place votes received in the final voting. The figures in parentheses reflect the total points received.