In this article, the topic of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 will be addressed from a multidisciplinary perspective, exploring its implications in different areas of daily life. The impact that United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 has had on society will be analyzed, as well as the possible implications it could have in the future. Through an exhaustive review of the specialized literature, we will seek to provide a comprehensive and updated vision of this topic, in order to encourage reflection and debate around it. Different approaches and expert opinions will be presented, as well as concrete examples that illustrate the relevance and scope of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 today. This article aims to provide a complete and enriching overview of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, giving readers the tools necessary to fully understand it.
UN Security Council Resolution 688 | ||
---|---|---|
Date | 5 April 1991 | |
Meeting no. | 2,982 | |
Code | S/RES/688 (Document) | |
Subject | Iraq | |
Voting summary |
| |
Result | Adopted | |
Security Council composition | ||
Permanent members | ||
Non-permanent members | ||
|
United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, adopted on 5 April 1991, after receiving letters from the representatives of France, Iran, and Turkey and expressing its concern over political repression of the Iraqi people, including those in Iraqi Kurdistan, the Council condemned the repression and demanded that Iraq, as a contribution to removing the threat to international peace and security, end the repression and respect the human rights of its population.
The Council insisted that Iraq allow access by international humanitarian organizations to the areas affected, requesting the Secretary-General to report on the Iraqi and Kurdish populations affected by repression from the Iraqi authorities, using all resources possible to address the needs of the population. It also demanded Iraq co-operate with the Secretary-General and international organizations to assist in humanitarian aid efforts.
The resolution was adopted by ten votes in favor, three votes against (Cuba, Yemen, and Zimbabwe), and two abstentions (the People's Republic of China and India).
France, the United Kingdom, and United States used Resolution 688 to establish Iraqi no-fly zones to protect humanitarian operations in Iraq, though the resolution made no explicit reference to no-fly zones.