User:Umarwrites/sandbox
Nowadays, User:Umarwrites/sandbox is a topic on everyone's lips. Whether due to its historical relevance, its impact on society or its influence in today's world, User:Umarwrites/sandbox has become a point of interest for researchers, academics and the general public. In this article, we will explore this topic in depth from different perspectives, analyzing its origins, evolution and consequences in different areas. Furthermore, we will try to provide a complete and detailed overview of User:Umarwrites/sandbox, addressing both its positive and negative aspects. Without a doubt, User:Umarwrites/sandbox is a fascinating topic that arouses the curiosity of many, and we are sure that the information we will present here will be of great interest to our readers.
Submission declined on 10 July 2025 by Jlwoodwa (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 9 July 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by DoubleGrazing 5 months ago. | |
Muhammad Umar
Muhammad Umar is a Pakistani-American political commentator and transformation executive. He regularly appears on Pakistan Television (PTV World) and contributes to publications such as ‘‘The Washington Post’’, ‘‘The News International’’, and The Stimson Center's ‘‘South Asian Voices’’.
Early life and education
Umar holds a Master’s degree from Columbia University and a Bachelor’s degree from Kutztown University of Pennsylvania.
Career
Government and policy
Umar is a non-resident fellow at the Centre for International Strategic Studies (CISS) in Islamabad. His research has focused on nuclear deterrence, disarmament, and regional security policy. He was previously a visiting scholar at the Federation of American Scientists and holds a certification in Nuclear Safety and Safeguards from Brookhaven National Laboratory. He has served in advisory roles with the Pakistan First Movement and the All Pakistan Muslim League during their formative years. His writing has appeared in policy platforms including South Asian Voices and Eurasia Review.
Corporate leadership
Umar is the Director of the Transformation Management Office at Vertex Inc. (NASDAQ: VERX), a tax compliance technology company. His role includes managing strategic business transformation programs. He has also held previous leadership positions at Pakistan Television (PTV), and has been involved in media, SaaS, and entrepreneurial ventures over an 18-year career.
Media and commentary
Umar has written on U.S. national politics, South Asian policy, and international affairs. His commentary has appeared in ‘‘The Washington Post’’, ‘‘The News International’’, and ‘‘The Express Tribune’’. He has also been featured as a television commentator on PTV World, including multiple interviews and panel appearances on foreign policy, regional security, and global governance topics. His fellowship with the Centre for International Strategic Studies (CISS) is recognized on the organization’s official website. Muhammad Umar – Profile at Centre for International Strategic Studies His peer-reviewed article on Pakistan’s strategic nuclear posture has been cited in academic publications, including NJIPS (NUST Journal of International Peace and Stability), listed in ScienceOpen and ProQuest databases, and referenced in research commentary by the Institute of Policy Studies. Strategic Culture of India and Pakistan and its Implications for Strategic Stability, NJIPS, 2023 Nasr: A Product of Pakistan’s Strategic Culture – ScienceOpen IPS Annual Report 2015–16 – Institute of Policy Studies
Selected publications
• “Profile Page” – The Stimson Center (SAV) • “Nasr: A Product of Pakistan's Strategic Culture” – Political Perspectives (JSTOR) • “OpEd Columnist page” – The News International • “The Economy, Doge Service, and Elon Trump” – The Washington Post • “Famine, Genocide, and the Politics of Aid” – The Washington Post
References
External coverage and third-party sources
PTV World Interview – Global Geopolitics Panel
PTV World Interview – Kashmir Issue Discussion
PTV World Segment – Strategic Stability in South Asia
PTV World – Pakistan-India Relations Analysis
PTV World – U.S. Politics and Foreign Policy Panel
PTV World – South Asian Regional Outlook
Muhammad Umar – CISS Fellow Profile
Notes
The citations reflect published work by Muhammad Umar across verified international and national outlets.
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.