User talk:195.56.247.82
Today, User talk:195.56.247.82 is a topic that arouses great interest in society, since it affects a large number of people around the world. From its origins to its impact today, User talk:195.56.247.82 has been the subject of debate and study by experts in the field. In this article, we will explore the various aspects related to User talk:195.56.247.82, from its causes and effects to the possible solutions that have been proposed to address this problem. Through a comprehensive analysis, we will seek to shed light on this issue and provide a broader and clearer vision of the impact it has on our environment.
February 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
This IP reverted without explanation a substantial cleanup edit on Gedeon Richter plc. I have reverted the revert as vandalism, but am open to discussion if this is not the case. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Ineligible to review GA nominations
195.56.247.82, according to GA reviewing rules, only registered accounts may review GA nominations.
Your review of Hungary has been closed, as it was not valid, and the nomination returned to the pool of articles awaiting review. Please do not open any other GA reviews. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
March 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Hungary topics. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mathglot (talk) 11:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Template:Hungary topics
Your feedback is welcome regarding a content dispute at Template:Hungary topics you were involved in. Please see Template talk:Hungary topics#Coat of arms. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 05:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Discuss, do not revert. Try to gain consensus for your position. See WP:BRD. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
Hello, I'm Denniss. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Barbara Palvin, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Denniss (talk) 08:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.