User talk:Biblioworm
In this article, we will explore the fascinating world of User talk:Biblioworm, analyzing its impact on different aspects of society. From its origin to its relevance today, User talk:Biblioworm has captured the attention of academics, scientists and enthusiasts alike. We will learn about its evolution over time, as well as its influence on culture, politics and the economy. Through a detailed analysis, we will discover the many facets of User talk:Biblioworm and its importance in the contemporary context. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive view of User talk:Biblioworm, addressing its most relevant aspects and offering a multidisciplinary perspective that allows the reader to appreciate its true scope.
 | This user is not currently active on Wikipedia. Biblioworm has not edited Wikipedia since 2 February 2025. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | I'm Biblioworm (a.k.a. Mike N. Johnson). Use this talk page to address any questions or concerns you may have. Please click here to leave me a new message.
|
| See my old talk page archives on the following pages: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017. |
The Bugle: Issue 233, September 2025
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 October 2025
- News and notes: Larry Sanger returns with "Nine Theses on Wikipedia"; WMF publishes transparency report
This time "not merely negative".
- In the media: Extraordinary eruption of "EVIL" explained
Wickedpedia wrangles post-truth politics.
- Disinformation report: Emails from a paid editing client
Unexpected news!
- Discussion report: Sourcing, conduct, policy and LLMs: another 1,339 threads analyzed
Fifty hot topics from fourteen noticeboards.
- Community view: The pressing questions of the modern WWW, as seen from the Village Pump
Policy, politics, icons, captchas, and LLMs.
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia a merchant of (non-)doubt for glyphosate?; eight projects awarded Wikimedia Research Fund grants
And other recent publications.
- Opinion: Some disputes aren't worth it
When to walk away.
- Obituary: Michael Q. Schmidt
Rest in peace.
- Traffic report: Death, hear me call your name
Celebrities, deaths and software.
- Comix: A grand spectacle
All invited!
Administrators' newsletter – October 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Arbitration
- After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g.
]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.
The Signpost: 20 October 2025
- News and notes: Board shuffles, LLM blocks increase, IPs are going away
And the "Global Resource Distribution Committee" emerges.
- Special report: The election that isn't
Two shortlisted WMF Board candidates removed from the ballot.
- Interview: The BoT bump
Who was bumped and why?
- In the media: An incident at WikiConference North America; WMF reports AI-related traffic drop and explains Wikipedia to US conservatives
...while Musk prepares to launch "Grokipedia".
- Traffic report: One click after another
Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.
- Humour: Wikipedia pay rates
Don't get too excited before you read this.
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
| Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Biblioworm! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2025 (UTC) |  |
FAR: House of Plantagenet
I have nominated House of Plantagenet for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2025 (UTC)