In today's world, User talk:Enigmaman/Archives/2008/August has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a large number of people in different areas of society. Whether due to its impact on culture, the environment, politics or the economy, User talk:Enigmaman/Archives/2008/August has managed to capture the attention of academics, professionals and the general public. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to User talk:Enigmaman/Archives/2008/August, its importance and its influence on various aspects of daily life. From its origins to its possible future consequences, we will take an in-depth look at the relevance of User talk:Enigmaman/Archives/2008/August in today's world.
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Enigmaman. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for the award!--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 23:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you've closed my sock puppetry case for "lack of manpower," but like I've explained in my July 28 edit, an admin (Thatcher) confirmed that the user Fragments of Jade and 76.120.173.40 were one and the same despite their claims to the contrary.
Shouldn't that be enough to close the case?
That would be helpful, as that user has been quite bothersome in the past few weeks... Ludicrous and baseless accusations of racism, sock puppetry, etc... Erigu (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
It's one of those books I was forced to read as part of the curriculum (it's a common mandatory text in the Australian English Higher School Certificate) that made me stop reading because of how poorly written and overrated it was. It left me with a sour taste in my mouth and I didn't pick up novels again for another year and a half.
While I would like to aid in fixing the article I currently have other issues in real life that is keeping me from doing anything really contributory to wikipedia outside of basic janitorial tasks, I only de-prodded the article because despite my disdain for it it is a notable work. I will, however, in due course aid as best I can when I get an opportunity. –– Lid(Talk) 06:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
| The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
| For doing a really good job at WP:SSP when no one else will bother. Good job, my friend. ScarianCall me Pat! 23:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC) |
I guess if I'm going to keep working the night shift, I should learn how to close these things. Seems to come up a lot. :) Darkspots (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
And we thought that people having guestbooks and secret pages was a bad idea. Forget WP:MYSPACE, how about WP:EHARMONY. I ought to update the WP:NOT page with that: "Wikipedia is not an online dating service". J.delanoygabsadds 22:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Something doesn't smell quite right here. Footballfan was blocked following the SSP/RFCU, yet he still edited today? Also, what's up with this edit from Darkspots? GlassCobra 04:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Enigma, I've been crazy busy offline. No time to wiki this last two months. I'll be back soon though. Non Curat Lex (talk) 21:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
FYI, see this blacklisting entry:
I'm not sure that this will stop our Volano Software spammer/troll, but it may slow him down some.
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 04:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I would like for you to reopen this case if at all possible. The reason given -"There is not enough manpower on a volunteer-run encyclopaedia to deal with this. Consider checkuser"- for closing it does not seem suitable to me. I would understand if you said it may take some time, in which case you would have to leave it open longer. I doubt that there is lack of manpower. I was told that the evidence was inconclusive, so I would prefer it if the admins would all be on the same page when it comes to closing a case. As far as checkuser goes, I do not think it will reveal anything given that the suspect is thought to have IP spoofing software. I have more evidence to submit. While this would make the case bigger, I would like some feedback on how to proceed. Libro0 (talk) 18:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate anyone who has patience enough to give their time. If the case cannot be reopened, I would like to open a second case in order to make the situation as clear to you as it is to me. Libro0 (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I have 2 things to ask you:
1) Every time I sign with my signature with 4 ~ it then later had (precedingly unsigned by jonni_boi) is there anyway of stopping it???
2) Will I manage to stop the unsigned bit added on the end, by making my signature in colour??? If so how do I go about doing it in colour???
I noticed you've been on here for long so I thought you could help me...
Please reply on my talk page Jonni Boi 19:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
if it doen't work it's User: Jonni_boi
Hi, I noticed your recent "major cleanup" of Mariano Messera, two things, you deleted the sort key leaving the article without a defaultsort key of any description and you replaced the piped link to Association football with a piped link to a redirect page, Football (soccer) was moved rather a long time ago. I fixed these problems. EP 21:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Enigma, did you know RC retired? He let me know yesterday on the phone. Sad huh? Burner0718 Jibba Jabba! 03:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I have submitted a new SSP. In this case I have removed the anonymous IPs that were in the previous case. I have also removed the Box Benefits and Omero Tognon since those represent a different situation. Both myself and the suspected puppetmaster have accused each other of making those. In my opinion that would be enough to close those. The third possibility that they belong to a legitimate 3rd party is extremely unlikely for a variety of reasons. Libro0 (talk) 04:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting me. I guess I just figured that his release would be the last entry under the Yankees section and, when it wasn't, I threw it in without reading. Cheers, JEB90 (talk) 20:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Sexson didn't surprise me. Melky did in that they waited this long. Then again I think Girardi will throw everything down to save himself. Have I mentioned I don't like him? :) Happy Friday TravellingCari 21:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Uh... I think something's wrong with Scarian... the user page doesn't exist anymore and the talkpage has completely been blanked. Something's fishy... RoryReloaded (talk) 08:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
I have been a member here for some time. Given you are adding to their good article group why not join? Just a thought. --VS talk 03:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Enigmaman, in this AFD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Kansas State Wildcats football team, you made the following comment: "Policy is firmly against making articles for future teams". I nominated similar future team season articles for deletion, and I was wondering if you had a wlink to that policy you referred to. Thanks. — X96lee15 (talk) 04:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind copyediting 1964 Gabon coup d'etat? This issue was raised at ts FAC. --I'm an Editorofthewiki 14:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll give you even more cookies if you help promote 1964 Gabon! The Bald One White cat 18:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
I think these two bits might possibly reference out of the book which I think you have a copy of? Perhaps the index will give you page numbers and then we can finalise them off? Your thoughts?
--VS talk 21:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
I use Audacity. Hope that helps :) Seddσn talk Editor Review 00:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| She struck my archives again. -WarthogDemon 01:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for signing up. You are just in time to consider Wikipedia:CHICAGO/leadership.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Well done my friend. GA deserved to a historically important sportsman. So now that you have a taste what is the next article in your sights? --VS talk 21:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
FYI he's a confirmed sock, I rolledback his edits on the talk page of Glennon. Gnangarra 14:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)