User talk:ExRat is a topic that has captured the attention of many over the years. With an impact that transcends generations, User talk:ExRat has been the subject of debate, analysis and reflection in various areas. From its origins to its relevance today, the User talk:ExRat continues to fascinate experts and hobbyists alike. In this article we will explore different aspects related to User talk:ExRat, from its historical importance to its influence on modern society. Through detailed analysis, we will try to better understand the impact that User talk:ExRat has had and continues to have on our lives.
Hi @ExRat, I marked Rapolas as an AfD (discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapolas a few months ago when I was not an experienced editor. You disagreed and you were correct. But I marked it due to confusion with draft:Rafael (name page). User:Clarityfriend explained why, saying "I'm one of the !voters who voted against your proposition. The names are simply too different. Your draft got declined because there are already numerous Rafaels listed in Raphael (given name)#Rafael, though either keeping them together or splitting them off is generally considered acceptable. (Also, the disambiguation "name page" is non-standard.) In fact, I will do the split, since there are separate dab pages, Raphael (disambiguation) and Rafael.
" And someone else said "The relevant page you were duplicating was Rafael (given name) not Raphael (given name) despite the reviewers posting the wrong link though they really should know better. The failure on behalf of User:Pythoncoder and User:Gobonobo to correct the error of User:Kovcszaln6 is unfortunate and led to confusion but the declines were correct. The page was also poorly formatted, omitted many valid entries and used an incorrect disambiguator though admittedly that is fixable during new page review.
" This is why. Thanks, ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 23:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi @ExRat, you reverted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rapolas&oldid=prev&diff=1312706631. Although both "variant" and "cognate" is generally acceptable, I thought that "variant" is a better term since you called it a variant at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapolas. But thank you for your contributions to support Wikipedia. PS: Remember to view my comment above if you have not since you never responded... ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 22:16, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
With regard to , I know it does :D that edit happened because I'm going through all the links in context of Talk:Nico (disambiguation)#primary topic?, to clarify the incoming links and make sure there's as little impact as possible if there's a change. --Joy (talk) 21:52, 27 November 2025 (UTC)