Tu banner alternativo

User talk:HerrRobot

In this article, the topic of User talk:HerrRobot will be addressed from a broad and analytical perspective, with the aim of providing the reader with a comprehensive vision of this matter. Different approaches, theories and studies related to User talk:HerrRobot will be examined, in order to offer a deeper and more complete understanding of it. Throughout the article, various facets of User talk:HerrRobot will be explored and substantiated arguments will be presented that will expand knowledge around this topic. Through a rigorous and systematic approach, the aim is to provide readers with a detailed and enriching vision of User talk:HerrRobot, with the purpose of encouraging reflection and debate around this issue that is so relevant today.

Tu banner alternativo

Your submission at Articles for creation: SpaceHey (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, CamelDuck! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SpaceHey has been accepted

SpaceHey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 11:04, 25 July 2021 (UTC)