User talk:Lucianraven

Hello. Your recent edit to Springfield High School (Illinois) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, LeAnne Stuart Withrow, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Lucianraven, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

@GPL93: Good morning! You mentioned in the notes that the article was "Heavily refbombed with unreliable sources, possible COI issues" - Does that mean that I over-cited? And can you help me understand which of my sources is unreliable so I can fix that for the future? This is my first whole article, so I want to get it right, thanks! Lucianraven (talk) 13:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

It means heavily sourced with non-reliable and non-notability substantiating sources. Notability is established through coverage about the subject via coverage that is about the source. Facebook, Amazon links and articles and press releases written by the subject do not help establish notability. After taking closer look at these sources I'm not really sure if any of the links used are reliable coverage. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Every statement needs to be supported by reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LeAnne Stuart Withrow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LeAnne Stuart Withrow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbrks (talk) 17:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Lucianraven! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbrks (talk) 17:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:LeAnne Stuart Withrow. Thanks! Zeromonk (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello! I hope you don't mind two replies but I just wanted to give you a more personal reply about your editing and it felt more appropriate to do it here rather than on the article talk page...

Sometimes it's better to have something short with good citations and key details that make someone clearly important enough to feature in an encyclopedia rather than something longer that has to resort to less trustworthy sources, which might lead people to doubt whether they are really notable or actually mostly just like anyone else! Think of it as a start (which is a classification of article on Wikipedia) that can always be expanded as more is written about someone (you could even get the ball rolling on this by emailing to suggest to editors e.g. of magazines on military culture and history or of LGBTQ+ issues that they commission something on Withrow - that is just a suggestion of something I've been personally motivated to do when I'm shocked that there isn't more coverage of an interesting person or topic and I definitely don't expect that it's a next step for everyone!). I hope this is helpful feedback about how Wikipedia works and not too frustrating for you. You've clearly done lots of research and the page is very tidily formatted and clearly written - with just a bit more awareness of how sourcing etc works, those are qualities that makes for a great Wikipedian so I do hope you'll keep editing! Zeromonk (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LeAnne Stuart Withrow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LeAnne Stuart Withrow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Lucianraven. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LeAnne Stuart Withrow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Lucianraven. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LeAnne Stuart Withrow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

LeAnne Withrow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sksatsuma 14:34, 15 December 2025 (UTC)