User talk:Mathijsloo

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Incorporation (Netherlands) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incorporation (Netherlands) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

gidonb (talk) 22:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beatrice de Graaf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NOS. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of equestrian statues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gage Munroe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

I wasn't aware that even these kind of small pieces of information should have a reference. Mathijsloo (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Dear Martinloo, If I am not mistaken, it is you who added last August a banner on the article Castle Poséidon, with two claims: 1.This article needs additional citations for verification. 2.This article possibly contains original research. I am persuaded that this article is in conformity with Wikipedia-rules.

May I ask you to remove the banner, or otherwise to motivate its content? Best Regards Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Dear Andries, I think the first of the two claims could be removed from the banner, because some inline references have been added last months. Although, there are still some paragraphs in the history outline that have none. Regarding the original research claim, I think this still is at play. In the bibliography-section shows archival records, and Geneanet. Also the YouTube-link at the architecture section requires a better source. Therefore, it is in my opinion to early to remove the claim regarding original research. Mathijsloo (talk) 14:32, 1 December 2025 (UTC)