User talk:MikeAllen
In this article we are going to analyze User talk:MikeAllen in depth, exploring its different aspects and possible implications. User talk:MikeAllen is a topic that has captured the attention of many in recent years, and its relevance and impact cannot be underestimated. Throughout these pages, we will examine User talk:MikeAllen from various perspectives, from its origins to its present day, including its possible future evolutions. We will address both its most positive aspects and the challenges it poses, with the aim of offering a complete and balanced view of User talk:MikeAllen. We hope that this analysis contributes to enriching knowledge on this topic and fostering a constructive debate around it.
Welcome to my talk page!
- Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
- If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
- Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|MikeAllen}}.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
- Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
- Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
Administrators' newsletter – December 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Technical news
- Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
- Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958
Miscellaneous
- The December 2025 administrator elections are scheduled from Nov 25 – Dec 15.
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in December 2025, with over 1,000 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Administrator Elections - Voting Phase
The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Abigail is not a Dracula movie
Dear Mike can you remove Abigail from the modern list of the Universal Monsters article since it doesn't actually count as a Dracula movie didn't same the name or anything relating to the title it's a Universal Vampire film like An American Werewolf in London is a Universal Werewolf film. ~2025-39347-76 (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know if the last voyage of the demeter counts or not. ~2025-39347-76 (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Hey
“No one knows, or cares who you are. I promise.” That’s not nice i’ll have to report you for cyber-bullying ~2025-39765-01 (talk) 14:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ClarkKentWannabe (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Sinners (2025 film) § Synopsis
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sinners (2025 film) § Synopsis. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Re:Sock
Just letting you know I already submitted a report at SPI. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:09, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. They have been blocked. Mike Allen 01:12, 17 December 2025 (UTC)