Tu banner alternativo

User talk:Polygnotus

In today's article we will explore the fascinating world of User talk:Polygnotus, a topic that has captured society's attention for a long time. Whether due to its impact on history, its relevance today or its future potential, User talk:Polygnotus has generated constant interest in different areas and has been the subject of numerous debates and studies. Throughout this article, we will try to analyze different aspects related to User talk:Polygnotus, from its origin to its possible implications in the future, with the aim of offering a comprehensive vision of this exciting topic.

Tu banner alternativo

Eine Treppe

Reporting DetectPromo false-positive

Holy_Trinity_Lock_II "leading" in phrase "leading to/leading from” is not promotional Plutus 💬 mess Fortune favors the curious 05:39, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Plutus, Polygnotus is currently on a wikibreak; they've also requested to be blocked for a month and, so, can't respond. Salvio giuliano 06:20, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Noted Plutus 💬 mess Fortune favors the curious 06:24, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Reporting DuplicateReferences false-positive

Genetic representation http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44874-8 Naruyoko (talk) 10:55, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Reporting DetectPromo false-positive

ALM_Flight_980 "massive" in phrase "massive de-acceleration" is not promotional birdn4t0r (talk) 01:24, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Sub-referencing: News and request for feedback

Greetings from WMDE's Technical Wishes team. Today we've deployed sub-referencing to German Wikipedia, our first pilot wiki. A great milestone after so many years of work!

We'll continue to improve the feature based on community feedback and want to deploy to other pilot wikis in the upcoming months, once we've solved a couple of issues affecting many non-dewiki projects. You are invited to try sub-referencing on betawiki in the meantime.

We are currently thinking about how we could improve VisualEditor support for templates in sub-references if that's desired by the community. Read more about it on our talk page and share your feedback!

As always thank you very much for your support!

PS: You are receiving this message, because you signed-up to our sub-referencing newsletter. If you don't want to receive further updates, just remove your name from the list.

Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-39

MediaWiki message delivery 22:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Block

Hi Polygnotus, I thought you were indef blocked and couldn't see the standard message. Got a fright, but everything is ok. See you in a month. scope_creepTalk 06:17, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

@Scope creep No worries, I just had to do some things in real life so I asked User:Salvio giuliano to block me for a bit so I could focus on 'em. Taking a break once in a while is good for my health. Polygnotus (talk) 18:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Welcome back and happy editing! Salvio giuliano 19:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you! Polygnotus (talk) 19:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-40

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

A cat for you!

This cat likes goats.

NekoKatsun (nyaa) 13:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 19


MediaWiki message delivery 14:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Barnstar and Questions

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For talk page stalking on User talk:Oshwah and helping me write an entire script! HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 17:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

You deserve a fat barnstar. Also, is there any way to, like, invoke the script, or is it automatically invoked? HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 17:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

@HwyNerd Mike Thanks! JavaScript runs when the page is loaded. https://claude.ai/ is an LLM that can help with JavaScript.
You should add
importScript('User:HwyNerd Mike/Polygnotus.js');
to
User:HwyNerd Mike/common.js
to actually load the file.
Note that the output (HwyNerd Mike has edited in last 3 days: true) will be put in the browser console. To open it press F12, then click Console.
If you can't find the browser console, you can change
console.log(`${username} has edited in last ${days} days: ${result}`);
to
alert(`${username} has edited in last ${days} days: ${result}`);
in User:HwyNerd Mike/Polygnotus.js. Polygnotus (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Some more links that may be useful:
Polygnotus (talk) 01:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you! HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 01:49, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #702

Tech News: 2025-43

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

Comparing thoughts on WMF issues

Hello! I wanted to pick your brain about the Board election issue, specifically about how it compares to the censorship issue from a couple months ago where we disagreed. I have to conclude that I'm misunderstanding or missing something on my end. At that time, you were one of the main proponents of supporting the WMF's decision to accept the ruling and you said I am also not a lawyer, and I only have access to the publicly available information linked on this page. Which is why I find it difficult to judge if the WMF is doing the right thing. And since they have a legal department, and hire external lawyers, it seems reasonable to give them the benefit of the doubt, right? and a few other statements to this effect. In my mind, the concerns of non-public information and institutional and legal expertise would also apply to the WMF's selection of Board members. But you're one of the main people standing against their removal from the ballot. I was wondering if you see this as applying to one and not the other on a fundamental level, or if it's a more practical matter like weighing pros and cons. For reference, your reaction to the Board issue is how I see both situations, except that I consider the censorship issue to be more existential in the long-term.

I was originally going to leave this as a comment under the Signpost article, but I worried it would cause drama or derail the conversation. I also get it if you don't want to drudge this up again. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:08, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

@Thebiguglyalien: Hi!
In general I try to give everyone, including the WMF, the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes I fail, but that is because I am a flawed human and not a perfect alien like you. Most people, generally speaking, are trying to do the right thing. I hope.
I think these cases are quite different (although I of course happily accept that I am a hypocrite, which in my view is not a bad thing to be). Which of my many hypocritical actions and statements confused you?
To give an example of the differences: Lane asked the WMF to publicly post their reasoning, and the WMF asked Lane to not disclose what they had told Lane. Which puts Lane in an awkward position; how can Lane refuse?
In the case of that office action we don't want the WMF to openly discuss their legal strategy (which could harm them and us in the future). We also want them to keep a bunch of secrets for privacy reasons. Being transparent is cool, but loose lips sink ships.
In that Office action case I felt a lot of the more extreme criticism of the WMF was unfair and based upon faulty reasoning, incorrect assumptions and a lack of understanding how the real world works (even if you are right you don't always get your way on this planet).
But you're one of the main people standing against their removal from the ballot. I objected to the removal of one of them (Lane), because the grounds upon which that decision was made were incomprehensible and/or incorrect. On the other hand I also wrote that I would've accepted "we don't like him, we don't want to work with him" as a valid reason, so the bar is REALLY low and they failed to clear even that.
In the other case I find it weird that they hadn't discovered these alleged social media posts (if they exist) because that is a normal part of due diligence and they probably could've handled it better, but I don't think they did enough wrong to be really mad about it, you know? It is just sad that we live in a world where such things happen.
I don't think the board of trustees thing has much to do with legal, as far as I know. I think its more about reducing the attack surface; the far right is gonna far right anyway.
So in my mind these are 2 rather different situations with little in common. I strongly believe the WMF was attempting to do the right thing in both cases.
As an alien, you have observed humans for a long time. You know how much we suck.
Hope that helps, if you give more specific examples of contradictory statements I can try to explain how my alleged brain works. Polygnotus (talk) 22:41, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Cool! I just wanted to get your thoughts since we agreed on one issue but not the other. I don't think it's hypocritical, more that I was wondering where the divergence was. It helps to see the more specific aspects you're considering, so thanks for taking the time to reply. I do get that legal strategy can't be disclosed (that was the part I was okay with at the time), and I also believe that most people see themselves as trying to do the right thing. And trust me, Martian society isn't much better... they're the ones who stranded me on Earth after all! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 23:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Ha! Stranded! We both know you can leave any time you want. And you will once you've synthesized the tyridiam crystals, leaving chaos and destruction in your wake. Polygnotus (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
If the WMF does the right thing I will defend them, even if we don't get the result we want. If the WMF does something stupid I might criticize it.
I think that in both cases I criticized faulty reasoning, and I don't really care if the source is the WMF or the alleged community.
We desperately need the WMF to be on our team, and they don't really need us as much. Polygnotus (talk) 00:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Editsummaries

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

@Zackmann08 I was actually thinking of making a script that autogenerates editsummaries based on context clues. E.g. if someone is on a talkpage or noticeboard they are usually adding or revising a comment, and a script could handle that automatically. Polygnotus (talk) 22:47, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
I 100% support that! I have a number of scripts that autogenerate edit summaries when coming from a category page (see User:Zackmann08/category-links.js).
I have reverted a few of your edits because you didn't provide ANY indication of why content was removed... It looks like you are bulk removing Award sections... Is there a specific reason? To be clear, I'm not saying that material belongs on the page... Honestly I'm indifferent to that... But with I see a large red number in the edit history with zero explanation, it is a definite red flag. If you can link to some WP:MOS doc or something in your edit summary or at least say removing awards section that is purely WP:PROMO that would be very helpful. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
@Zackmann08 I used to have this canned editsummary script thing but I lost it. Have to look in to that again.
I assume you do that manually? Modern vandalfighting scripts use ORES so people don't really have to deal with that.
Yeah companies can pay to be part of an award program, and then they get an award. See for example https://bestinbizawards.com/entry-fees/ and https://wcwawards.com/registration/ and https://stevieawards.com/sales/entry-fees?from=mobile In the case of the Best in Biz thing its founded by someone with a background in "corporate communications". Its a win-win, the company pays a couple hundred dollar and then you can claim you are the exemplary best super person of the year, which might impress some people.
Gimme a sec I may be able to find it. Polygnotus (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Again to be clear, I'm not objecting to WHAT you removed, but the way in which you are removing it. The process maters which is why edit summaries are so important. I use WP:JWB a LOT and do thousands of tiny edits that are clearly uncontroversial. But I still need to provide an edit summary.
I'm not going to go through your edit history and revert any more, but moving forward, PLEASE put an edit summary. Whether you are editing manually, using a tool like WP:AWB/WP:JWB or whatever the case may be. Please put a summary, especially when your edits are thousands of bytes. Even just saying copyvio as you did here is better than nothing. I see that and I assume you are removing WP:COPYVIO. If I see 8,000+ bytes removed from an article on my watchlist with ZERO edit summary, that is going to get reverted with a summary of unexplained content removal. I'm not alone in this camp (it's why {{uw-delete1}} through {{uw-delete4}} exist). And to be clear, I would do that if it was an Admin with 2 million edits to their name... This absolutely is not personal. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Yeah I need to find a way to conveniently automate that. I am not a big fan of editsummaries because they slow me down and I always forget, but this is a problem that is fixable with a script. I wish we could add editsummaries in retrospect, via the API. And yes that edit was a little too close for comfort. Polygnotus (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Have you considered using WP:JWB or WP:AWB?? If you are removing awards sections from multiple pages, you can just load a list of pages, enter a single edit summary and then edit away... It is MUCH faster.... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
I considered making my own. So for example User:Polygnotus/Scripts/ListGenerator.js and User:Polygnotus/Scripts/ListGenerator2.js are me exploring in that direction. I am on Linux, and AWB has some weird WINE bugs. Someone should port that now that Micro$oft is dying. I should look into JWB, but I am not so sure it fits my workflow. Maybe I can tweak it a bit. In this case I started specifically with the Best in Biz awards, because its just a promotional tool, and then I discovered that those others are also promotional tools and not real awards. Capitalism is making me communist. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 23:23, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Hey I'm on a freaking iPad and JWB works really well. I highly encourage you to give it a try... And yes, capitalism SUCKS. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
AI editsummary
@Zackmann08 Perhaps User:Polygnotus/Scripts/AI Editsummary.js is a step in the right direction. Not a finished product ofcourse, just an experiment. Polygnotus (talk) 10:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Samsung Electronics discussed a wide-ranging deal to invest in ] and put search technology from the artificial intelligence startup. The two companies are in talks to preload Perplexity’s app and assistant on upcoming Samsung devices and integrate the startup’s search features into the Samsung web browser.
+
Samsung Electronics Co. is nearing a wide-ranging deal to invest in Perplexity AI Inc. and put search technology from the artificial intelligence startup at the forefront of the South Korean company’s devices. The two companies are in talks to preload Perplexity’s app and assistant on upcoming Samsung devices and integrate the startup’s search features into the Samsung web browser

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sébastien Lecornu on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 11:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #703

Tech News: 2025-44

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 20


MediaWiki message delivery 16:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Speedy deletion on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #704

Tech News: 2025-45

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

added Toadspike
removed

CheckUser changes

added asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


CS1 error on Husain Al-Musallam

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Husain Al-Musallam, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

Wikidata weekly summary #705

Tech News: 2025-46

MediaWiki message delivery 20:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 21


MediaWiki message delivery 23:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello!

A few questions:

  • Was Need some cluebats plox referring to me? I'm not offended, just curious.
  • You clearly feel that Category:Transgender history in the United States should be much smaller than it is, and have suggested that a wider discussion would be necessary before this change could happen. Do you think, in advance of that discussion, that debating at length whether to include the specific example of Zizians is productive?
  • If yes, why?

Any one of those might sound like a rhetorical question, but none of them are. Thanks (: lp0 on fire () 19:52, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

!Lp0 on fire
  1. See wikt:cluebat and wikt:plox It is basically internet slang for incredibly old people. No it wasn't referring to any particular person.
  2. Nope
Very few debates on Wikipedia are actually productive. Polygnotus (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
That's a depressing take, and I like to think it's not entirely accurate. I'm probably wrong though .͡. lp0 on fire () 21:33, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Not that depressing once you consider we are doing this for fun. And by this I mean both debating and writing an encyclopedia. When you have a good debate with someone on your level it can be a very enjoyable experience. On the other hand, debating an incompetent idiot may be frustrating at times. Usually both good and bad debates are not as productive as someone working on his/her own, but far less boring. Polygnotus (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
I personally think the productive aspect of a debate comes from the learning involved, rather than the outcome. If 50 editors participate in an RfC and close with consensus to change something, in principle that doesn't make the world any better than if one person makes an executive decision and there's no debate (hence why we have prod and not just AfD). The productive part of a debate is what people learn from it, whether that's learning about Wikipedia best practice, facts about the article subject, or something about human nature and what people do or don't find persuasive. I'm not really here to have fun; I'm here to make the world better by improving the world's most visible encyclopedia (and realistically also to procrastinate). While it's true that a single uncontroversial edit can make the world much better (rectifying a common misconception on Wikipedia can do a lot to improve the world, and who knows which vandalism reversion prevents what would have been the next Seigenthaler?), it's more likely that my single biggest contribution here will be making someone else realise how they can improve it too. The best debate is one that closes unanimously because all proponents of one opinion are persuaded by the other's arguments, but even if no one's mind is changed, I believe that people can learn a lot by going into a debate without their mind already being made up. lp0 on fire () 21:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
I personally think the productive aspect of a debate comes from the learning involved, rather than the outcome. Agreed, although we have few users who are able to actually critically look at their assumptions and change their opinion based on the information presented by others. Especially if they dislike that other person for whatever reason. Humans are not great at that kinda thing.
I think RfCs often devolve into a non-debate; a way to sidestep an actual debate, and I wish they were used far less. I've seen many RfCs where WP:RFCBEFORE was ignored (not in this case tho). I wish RfCs had both POVs posted side by side. I wish RfCs would explain the consequences of each option and how that would be achieved.
The best debate is one that hasn't happened because it didn't need to imo. Polygnotus (talk) 23:04, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Some categories have a sentence or two at the top which explains which articles should and should not be in that category. I think it should be required for all categories to have such a "definition", because it is often unclear which articles are just outside of the scope. Unfortunately no one has added this requirement to the PaGaEs yet. Polygnotus (talk) 20:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
That sounds like a good suggestion; I would support it wholeheartedly. From what I've observed so far on Wikipedia, it seems like categories mostly exist as a way to waste people's time by getting them to argue about pages that most readers don't know about on the talk pages for articles that matter. lp0 on fire () 21:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Exactly! Polygnotus (talk) 21:35, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #706

Tech News: 2025-47

MediaWiki message delivery 17:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Reporting DetectPromo false-positive

Physella_acuta "numerous" in phrase "The species presents a high diversity of shell shapes which led to numerous false species descriptions before the onset of molecular phylogenetic studies." is not promotional

Cool script, thanks for your work :)

Barbalalaika 🐌 14:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

AE discussion closed

As you are likely aware, I have closed the AE discussion about you with the following summary: "Polygnotus is warned to be careful about their wording when soliciting input on discussions, and to communicate in good faith when concerns are raised with their editing". I meant to leave this note when I closed the AE discussion yesterday, but I got pulled away, apologies for that. As this is a logged warning it is appealable in the same way as CTOP sanction per the contentious topics procedures. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

@Vanamonde93 Well, I don't really know what that means. If you want I can explain my POV to you, but I doubt it would be a very productive use of our time. Since the "warning" appears to be meaningless its retraction would also be meaningless. Maybe I can help you write Werner Stertzenbach instead? Pretty interesting dude. Polygnotus (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
It means that you are reminded to use neutral and explicit language when inviting input on a discussion, and when your actions are challenged you are reminded to explain yourself in good faith (as I am doing) rather than casting aspersions on the competence of the challenger. A failure to do so would likely result in sanctions. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
User:Example is not a real user/human; just a test account.
casting aspersions on the competence of the challenger would be for example saying "User:Example is a r-------- f------ i----" and I did not do that. If you think I did, please provide a diff.
What I did is say that someone doesn't understand a guideline, and I provided multiple proofs of that, with quotes, so anyone can look at the guideline and compare them to the quotes and see that I am correct. Polygnotus (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Also its probably a bad idea to ask me to use explicit language. please don't kill me this is a joke Polygnotus (talk) 18:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

WikiTextExpander

Hey! I wanted to try out User:Polygnotus/Scripts/WikiTextExpander, but it doesn't work if you have the beta feature "Improved Syntax Highlighting" (mw:Help:Extension:CodeMirror) enabled; it needs to target a different textarea that CodeMirror generates (I think, or maybe CM has an API to update the text). I'm going on a looong trip for like a week, so I'll only be able to create a patch after that; just letting you know in case you feel like fixing it yourself. Adios. — DVRTed (Talk) 20:13, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

@DVRTed What if I told you that I think that JavaScript is morally wrong and should be outlawed? You'd probably think I was joking. Anyway, maybe you can test User:Polygnotus/Scripts/WikiTextExpander2.js when you get back? Polygnotus (talk) 20:36, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, but it didn't work. Looks like there's no global "CodeMirror" variable even when it's enabled (different version?), so typeof CodeMirror !== 'undefined' is always false. I'll write a patch using something like this: Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests § Script for adding a References section in a few days. — DVRTed (Talk) 15:43, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Done here: User:DVRTed/sandbox/temp.js (diff). Also, off-topic, but you might enjoy reading through this amusing thread: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/14369. — DVRTed (Talk) 10:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
@DVRTed Thanks! I added it here and added you there.
Oh man I really like this Joel character. AI has a very deep understanding of how this code works. Please challenge me on this. He is also defending his actions on HN, with predictable results. Quote: Personally I would have those credits to generate hentai but to each his own i suppose.
The reason I like AI is the element of chaos, the fact we are asking a Markov chain things way beyond its capabilities, and are sometimes surprised. Polygnotus (talk) 12:03, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Please join us over at Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Tools. Polygnotus (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

WikiProject activity solution

I saw your recent Wishlist discussion over at Meta, and methinks I've got something that may be helpful toward the end of seeing who is most recently active on a WikiProject. Earlier this year, I completed development of a Project Leaderboard for WikiProject Louisville. I'm planning to roll it out to a couple other projects I'm involved with as well. The code used for it can easily be copied and mildly revised for practically any other WikiProject. Membership/participant lists on many projects are definitely stale, but this report works past that to show who's truly doing the project work, while giving special acknowledgment to those on the lists. Let me know if this is something you find useful. I'd be happy to make a version of this for projects you care about. Stefen 𝕋ower's got the power!!1! GabGruntwerk 04:02, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

@StefenTower Ooh that looks perfect! Do you think it is possible to scale that up to all active WikiProjects? Polygnotus (talk) 03:36, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Glad you like it. It's straightforward to make an individualized report for any active WikiProject. If alternatively you mean having a report covering all active projects in one, I'd say that is not as easy as it sounds to do, because 1) the database structure as it is would require a major rewrite of the query and it would be clunkier; and 2) rounding up all that data would likely run very slowly. If I'm misunderstanding what you're seeking, please give me more details. Stefen 𝕋ower's got the power!!1! GabGruntwerk 04:25, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Reporting DetectPromo false-positive

Justus_Smith_Stearns "signature" in phrase "signature =" is not promotional. It's part of the infobox! Cheers :-) LR.127 (talk) 13:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Reporting DetectPromo false-positive

Quebec_Winter_Carnival "leading" in phrase "leading up" is not promotional LR.127 (talk) 17:44, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

I've removed it anyway from the article, as it was part of a (potentially) COI editor's contribution that was generally promotional. LR.127 (talk) 18:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Reporting DetectPromo false-positive

The_Nunda,_Eater_of_People "legendary" in phrase "Category:Legendary birds" is not promotional. Actually, all stuff in categories should be ignored. Sorry for the multiple new reports on your talk page LR.127 (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #707

Tech News: 2025-48

MediaWiki message delivery 15:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 22


MediaWiki message delivery 17:30, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Mastercooks of Belgium

The best MJ, sorry Spiderman

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing the article I wrote. I have no problem removing promotional terms. But I have no idea what you're talking about. Could you help me out?

Thank you for your time. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

@Orlando Davis Sure, I can help. What is the question? Polygnotus (talk) 18:18, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I think you are saying that the 1.1 million views (Kanal Z) don't matter because they are mainly because they broadcast football. (soccer) matches? Is that why you put up the tag? Can you back that assertion? Orlando Davis (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
That is what the source says? https://www.cim.be/fr/television?type=yearly_top_10_per_channel&year=2018&region=south
Search for the word "MASTERCOOKS" on that page.
Do you speak French? If not you can use Google Translate or claude.ai or something like that.
See also WP:SYNTH and WP:PROMO. Basically no one watched that stuff and you call it highly viewed because the red devils did well at some point. Polygnotus (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I took French in high school, in addition I have a BA in Spanish.
ELEVEN FR is Football channel. That is different than Canal Z. A business channel that does not broadcast any football.
Are we good to go to take down the tag? Orlando Davis (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis What tag do you want to take down?
Do you see what I am saying about the viewership of Z MASTERCOOKS? Do you understand that calling it highly viewed is incorrect? Polygnotus (talk) 18:32, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Would you prefer if I say that in 2018, it was the second most viewed program on Canal Z? Orlando Davis (talk) 18:36, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis No, you need to stop promoting stuff. Wikipedia is not for promotion.
Can you explain why you think it makes sense to take the alleged weekly audience of two entire channels to make a SYNTH error about how popular a particular program is? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mastercooks_of_Belgium&diff=prev&oldid=1323016034
Have you read WP:SYNTH and WP:PROMO? Polygnotus (talk) 18:38, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I think that the fact it was the second most viewed program in 2018, is just a fact. And facts are not promotion. Just like Messi winning 8 balon d or's is a fact, not promotion. See the difference? I have a good source. The 1.1 million is an irrelevant detail. If you think it matters to take it down, I will. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:42, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Does that reach consensus? Orlando Davis (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis Please read WP:CONSENSUS. And please confirm you have read WP:PROMO and WP:SYNTH. Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 18:44, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I offered to change it to the facts. Word for word from a reliable source. I know for a fact that is not promotional. Please point to specific issues you have with writing nearly word for word from a reliable source? How does that break WP: PROMO? Cite a quote from that page. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis Please don't ignore my questions.
I offered to change it to the facts. No, you can't do that, see WP:SYNTH and WP:OR and WP:PROMO.
This is an encyclopedia. The goal is not to promote stuff. Our articles should be written dry and dispassionately. Polygnotus (talk) 18:57, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I am saying instead of hyping, we can simply cite accomplishments. Experience with sports pages thought me that this is the approach when there is disagreement. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:58, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis I answered your question. Can you please answer mine? Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Would you say this is promotional?
Lebron James
In addition to ranking fourth in NBA career assists and sixth in NBA career steals, James holds several individual honors, including four NBA MVP awards, four Finals MVP awards, the Rookie of the Year award, three All-Star Game MVP awards, the inaugural NBA Cup MVP, and the Olympics MVP in the 2024 Summer Olympics. A record 21-time All-Star and 21-time All-NBA selection (including a record 13 First Team selections), he has also made six All-Defensive Teams. The oldest active player in the NBA, he holds the record for the most NBA seasons played with 23 as well as playing the most minutes in league history.
We can follow this style in the Mastercooks page. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Please read WP:PROMO and WP:SYNTH and WP:CONSENSUS and WP:COPYVIO and then confirm that you have. Maybe even WP:INDENT.
Lebron James is irrelevant in this discussion.
Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 19:03, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Not sure I understand your question:
is this promotional? Why?
Michael Jordan
Jordan's individual accolades include six NBA Finals Most Valuable Player (MVP) awards, 10 NBA scoring titles (both all-time records), five NBA MVP awards, 10 All-NBA First Team designations, nine All-Defensive First Team honors, 14 NBA All-Star Game selections, and three NBA All-Star Game MVP awards. He holds the NBA records for career regular season scoring average (30.1 points per game) and career playoff scoring average (33.4 points per game). He is one of only eight players to achieve the basketball Triple Crown. In 1999, Jordan was named the 20th century's greatest North American athlete by ESPN and was second to Babe Ruth on the Associated Press' list of athletes of the century. Jordan was twice inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, once in 2009 for his individual career, and in 2010 as part of the 1992 United States men's Olympic basketball team ("The Dream Team"). The trophy for the NBA Most Valuable Player Award is named in his honor.
I am very collaborative. But you have to cite policy correctly. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:04, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Michael Jordan is also irrelevant in this discussion. If you refuse to read our policies and guidelines then Wikipedia is not as fun. I assure you, many of our policies and guidelines and essays contain valuable advice. They are worth reading. Polygnotus (talk) 19:06, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
We can replace hype with accomplishments. Stop policy page bombing and actually tell me which policy says that is wrong? Orlando Davis (talk) 19:07, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Find a quote in the policy page that says that please. Citing accomplishments is neutral. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I think you don't know policy on neutrality. I am trying to train you. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
You are trying to train me? As a chef I hope? I can make a pretty decent pizza but other than that I am mostly hopeless. Teach me how to cook a decent steak please. Polygnotus (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I am not a chef. I can't even cook anything. I write about stuff that has nothing to do with me, and more into guitar which I don't write about because I don't want to give free information. Don't take it personally, but it seems your view is what you like and don't like, not anything to do with policy. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:15, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis But I love empanadas and they are real expensive here. Like shockingly expensive. Maybe you can learn how to make empanadas and then you can teach me? I like the beef ones. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
They got minced beef, onion, garlic, bell pepper, raisin, olives (not too many, just enough), paprika powder, cumin I think you'd like them too. Polygnotus (talk) 19:25, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I'm not a cook, but my mom makes some great empanadas. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:27, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
If she can turn me into a halfway decent cook my wife will give her a lifesize statue of herself in pure gold. Polygnotus (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
WP:COMMONSENSE explains that encyclopedia writing is more than just making a list of alleged facts. Polygnotus (talk) 19:14, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Fine. If I just say that there is a T.V show on Canal Z. Is that enough? No hype. I really don't want to waste time on this issue because I'm busy. Does that achieve consensus. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:17, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Do you have a reliable source for that claim? Please read WP:CONSENSUS. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Okay. I think I know what happened. I must have deleted this source by accident. Here: https://www.cim.be/fr/television?type=yearly_top_10_per_channel&year=2018&region=south Orlando Davis (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Well that source confirms a TV show with that name exists. You probably need one that confirms there is a connection, not just a similar name, if that is what you want to say. I guess. Polygnotus (talk) 19:26, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
https://www.roularta.be/nl/over-roularta/persberichten/topchefs-de-tweede-reeks-z-mastercooks Orlando Davis (talk) 19:30, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Excellent, a source that confirms the show exists and that there is a link. Polygnotus (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqrO6jPHgPg Orlando Davis (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Thats Michael Jackson not Michael Jordan. I understand the confusion; they look almost identical. Polygnotus (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
I've been an NBA addict my whole life. I know MJ. And I know both MJ's. I am more of a rock guy. Orlando Davis (talk) 19:34, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
So you agree that I can add that there is a Z-Mastercooks show? Orlando Davis (talk) 19:35, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Yes, the roularta.be source confirms that the show exists and that there is a connection between it and the Mastercooks. Polygnotus (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you! Orlando Davis (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis After I cleaned up some of the promotional material, you added it back in. Can you please stop doing that? You wrote the article, now let others fix the problems please. Polygnotus (talk) 02:52, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis Please look at the article as it is currently. It is far from great, and contains many flaws and imperfections, but it stands a chance of surviving an AfD like this. We want only a boring dispassionate description.
See how the tone of the article has completely shifted? Instead of promotional it is now (mostly) factual. So please keep it like this and don't insert promotional text. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
You wrote about a back-to-school event but I can't find no evidence that such a thing ever existed. We do have but that just talks about their activities during the "rentrée" period (so after summer holiday). Polygnotus (talk) 04:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
I don't think I want to mess with article at this point. Even though I wrote it, it's Wikipedia's article. However, I believe I did source well. Here is the back to school event source: https://ccimag.be/2021/09/13/rentree-de-lassociation-the-mastercooks-of-belgium/
Thank you! Orlando Davis (talk) 23:30, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Perhaps I deleted accidentally. Orlando Davis (talk) 23:34, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis Yeah so you invented an event that does not exist. The source says nothing about a back to school event, but you are relying on a machine translation. You used Google Translate, which is pretty bad at translating. Polygnotus (talk) 23:44, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
I did use google translate. You caught me. My bad. It was not an intentional mistake, like I just make up sources. I use the translator to read the news from different countries every day, and it usually sounds right. I appreciate your attention to detail. Orlando Davis (talk) 00:10, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis Yeah I don't recommend Google Translate because it kinda sucks (don't tell Google I said that they will be sad).
Instead of using Google Translate, try copypasting the article into Claude.ai. Suddenly there is no more back-to-school event.
If I ask ChatGPT what "rentrée" means it does correctly explain: In French, especially in Belgium and France, “rentrée” does not only refer to the start of the school year. It more broadly means: the return from summer break, the resumption of activities, the official start of a new season or working period.
Polygnotus (talk) 00:11, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Got it! Thank you. Orlando Davis (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for the great editing work through the night (taking out the garbage) on Mastercooks of Belgium. Theroadislong (talk) 07:58, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
@Theroadislong Thank you! I am a firm believer in less is more (and all contradictory statements in general). Polygnotus (talk) 08:04, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
There are going to be similar issues with Draft:Michael Katz (chef) if accepted. Previously deleted here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Katz (chef). Theroadislong (talk) 08:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Previously deleted after being nominated by some weirdo. Polygnotus (talk) 08:23, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Ha! I hadn't noticed who nominated it! Theroadislong (talk) 08:25, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Choice made

See also this . If an admin does not block them first I will file at ANI later today. Thank you for cleaning up that Mastercooks article btw, that would have taken some patience. NicheSports (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@NicheSports Thanks! Yeah it was ehm, an experience. My best and worst quality is that I am as stubborn as a dead mule. Polygnotus (talk) 18:07, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
I think fifteen's point was fair (as it often is) and I'm not going to respond at that ANI thread or on OD's talk page anymore. Hopefully this is resolved soon. Admins feel a bit MIA on this one. NicheSports (talk) 21:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
@NicheSports If I was an admin I would also hope someone else dealt with that wall of text. Polygnotus (talk) 21:15, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Yo. Join me. Stop responding at ANI? Make me look good lol 😅 but woof I need a break from LLM patrol. Going to try some GA reviews to get on the other side (looking at some good content) NicheSports (talk) 21:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
@NicheSports I need to write Werner Stertzenbach. Polygnotus (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
I read the translated version from Deutsch wiki and was interesting. I am going to review a sumo article - back to my roots. I picked this username for a reason NicheSports (talk) 21:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
@NicheSports I once watched an explanation of Sumo wrestling on YouTube and it was genuinely interesting to see how similar and different it is compared to Judo. Polygnotus (talk) 21:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Holy heck, what a saga, relieved that is over. Sorry you kept getting dragged like that. If you are ever interested check out the Don Don sumo channel on YouTube, he annotates fights and is chill NicheSports (talk) 00:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
@NicheSports Good news, it ain't over yet. 22 weeks ago I discovered that an LTA had accumulated tens of thousands of edits pushing an interesting worldview (did you know that left-wing academics control the world and are all evil? It was news to me.) Our buddy received one or more messages from that LTA (while they are globally locked, naughty!).
Thanks, I subscribed. Stuff like this is all levers, torque and the transfer of momentum. Polygnotus (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

disruptive editing

Consensus has not been reached on the Police Abolition or Bianca Censori pages. The LLM tag is not valid, as there is currently no formal guideline prohibiting its use on Wikipedia talk pages. If you believe I am incorrectly applying tags, you are welcome to bring it to an administrator’s attention. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:08, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Orlando Davis See the section above this one. Polygnotus (talk) 18:09, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Orlando Davis Re: "no formal guideline prohibiting its use on Wikipedia talk pages "see Wikipedia:LLMCOMM. Theroadislong (talk) 18:23, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
This is an essay: Wikipedia:LLMCOMM.
"It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints."
That page reflects the opinions of some Wikipedians; it is not a formal guideline. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
@Orlando Davis Pretty sure Theroadislong meant WP:AITALK. Polygnotus (talk) 20:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Yes my apologies, "Comments that are obviously generated (not merely refined) by a large language model (LLM) or similar AI technology may be struck..." Theroadislong (talk) 20:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Sum RFC on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:38, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

Reporting DetectPromo false-positive

Reform_UK "leader in" in phrase "Farage stepped down as leader in March 2021" is not promotional GothicGolem29 (Talk) 02:38, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #708

Tech News: 2025-49

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

I see you are active at the Teahouse, so I put you in as a featured host (see Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host/Featured/10). Feel free to customize the picture to your liking. Interstellarity (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

@Interstellarity Thank you! I have added an image. Polygnotus (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Translated

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from nl:Graf met de handjes to Grave with the Hands. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at ]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 07:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

@GreenLipstickLesbian I started the article, but as far as I can remember I didn't actually use the Dutch article. I don't see Wikipedia as a reliable source so I am more likely to just use the sources themselves. I can add a null edit tho if you like. Polygnotus (talk) 07:23, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
There's no need, I did that for you.
Meaning no disrespect to your memory (mine's rubbish), I'd find it hard to believe that you didn't draw from the Dutch article: compare this revision with , and if you'd like a particular example them look at the paragraphs:

The cemetery Nabij Kapel in ’t Zand, colloquially known as "Oude Kerkhof" (the 'Old Cemetery'), originally served as a Jewish burial ground. By the late 18th century, it was expanded to accommodate other residents of Roermond. Architect Pierre Cuypers undertook a redesign of the cemetery in 1858, creating separate sections for Catholic and Protestant burials, divided by a wall.

(from the former)
and

The cemetery "Nabij de Kapel in 't Zand," popularly known as the "Oude Kerkhof," was originally a Jewish cemetery. At the end of the 18th century, it was expanded to include burial space for other residents of Roermond. Architect Pierre Cuypers redesigned the cemetery in 1858. Among other things, a Catholic and a Reformed section were established, separated by a wall.

(from the latter)
GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 07:28, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
@GreenLipstickLesbian Thanks. It is certainly possible, but I can't really give a definitive answer so I go with a politicians "can't confirm or deny".
It is also possible this comes from the same source. I probably still have the backup in cold storage somewhere, so I could probably look it up if you want, but I do not remember so far back. Polygnotus (talk) 07:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
"Never believe anything until it's been officially denied", that's my motto!
Possible, but I hope not. I translate articles from other Wikipedias sometimes (though not for a while - Lee Dong-hwan (diplomat) is my last, I believe). It's fine. You have to check and source everything, but it's free content so you can pretty much do what you like with it. Unless your same source happens to be public domain, learning that you both took closely from a 3rd party source would be very scary. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 07:40, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
@GreenLipstickLesbian My wife wins every discussion because she just sounds so confident and I have no clue if what she is claiming (but you said...) is true or not so I just fold in every debate. If she wanted to she could take advantage of my terrible memory so I just have to hope she doesn't. Polygnotus (talk) 07:52, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of best-selling video games on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 08:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #709

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Valereee
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2025-50

MediaWiki message delivery 17:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Reporting DuplicateReferences false-positive

Gregory Retallack https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995Pbio...21..393W — GreenC 18:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Claude vs Gemini

Thanks for the info. I haven't tried Gemini, will do so soon. Do you think Claude is better? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Piotrus Less bad. I strongly prefer Claude. Polygnotus (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
In that case, I would gladly take the key if you have working ones to share. Best email me at my name at gmail. TIA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
@Piotrus Take what you received by email and add this to it -7Iw3jtUTRRTeDG5ktvNPczCD6w-uEXo1QAA and then you have a working Claude key. Autoreload is disabled and you got a couple bucks. Polygnotus (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. Any estimate what is the cost of a single article run? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
@Piotrus 2 or 3 USD cents maybe? Depends a bit on the length of the article. You can do about 160 articles with what is left in the account I think. Polygnotus (talk) 10:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 23


MediaWiki message delivery 04:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello. About 16 days ago, you reached out to me saying that you wanted me to "take a look for errors and omissions" in Pilot deviation. And you later said, "I find it difficult writing about a topic I am no expert in." which, I think, casually means that you're calling me an expert in that subject of article.... no? So I was just curious as to why you reached out to me and how you knew I basically existed since we never interacted before. I'm not saying that "Why in the world did you reach out to me?", I'm just saying, "Huh, I'm curious why you reached out to me, very interesting". No offense given here, just purely curiosity. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Actually, yes, we technically did interact before. I use your duplicate ref detector script and it's really great and helpful. Thank you for that. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:36, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
@Ivebeenhacked Hi! Hm, I don't really remember and I don't store my browser history that long. Possibly because you were listed on WikiProject Aviation and I liked your username? I am not sure. Polygnotus (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Okay, I understand. I was just being curious. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:58, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #710

Tech News: 2025-51

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Test

This is a test. PolygnotusTest (talk) 21:11, 15 December 2025 (UTC)