In today's world, User talk:Sankalprawal has gained unprecedented relevance. Since its emergence, it has captured the attention and interest of countless individuals, becoming a recurring topic of conversation in all areas. Its impact has spread to all corners of the globe, arousing fervent interest and generating heated debates. User talk:Sankalprawal has left an indelible mark on society, significantly influencing the way people perceive the world around them. In this article, we will explore the phenomenon of User talk:Sankalprawal in depth, analyzing its origin, evolution and impact today.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gul Khan (producer) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Woodroar (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to Ravi Ravindra has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Woodroar (talk) 14:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Ravi Ravindra. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)